funsec mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:14:49 +0100
* Michael Blanchard:
I wouldn't think that they would vouch for it. Even when it's created by a trusted person such as Ilfak.
It's not just a trust issue. If they were sure that Ilfak's approach doesn't break anything important, they would release their own patch (which probably does something similar) today, and defer it until the January 10th, until proper regression testing and patch validation has taken place. I'm still a bit mystified how dangerous this vulnerability really is, beyond the mad-clicking home user. Maybe waiting one more week is the right thing to do from a technical perspective. It could prove a bad PR move, though. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Fergie (Jan 03)
- Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Barrie Dempster (Jan 03)
- Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Pierre Vandevenne (Jan 03)
- RE: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary'patch Randy Abrams (Jan 06)
- Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary'patch Gadi Evron (Jan 06)
- RE: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary'patch Randy Abrams (Jan 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Jan 03)
- Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Florian Weimer (Jan 03)