funsec mailing list archives
Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy?
From: James Kehl <shykta () dione ids pl>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:20:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Marcos Agüero wrote:
Dave Dennis wrote:3) there's a rule of life that says until incompetence can be cleared, conspiracy is not on the watch list.So, the best way to hide a conspiracy is showing it as incompetence. In fact, something that seems to be hidden is always suspicious.
Any signs of competence within government should be treated with deep and immediate suspicion. James _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Don Kennedy (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Dave Dennis (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Marcos Agüero (Mar 27)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 27)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? James Kehl (Mar 27)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Marcos Agüero (Mar 27)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Ron (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Dave Dennis (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Drsolly (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Drsolly (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Dude VanWinkle (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Technocrat (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Don Kennedy (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Marcos Agüero (Mar 27)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Dude VanWinkle (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Dude VanWinkle (Mar 25)
- Re: Could 9/11 Be A Conspiracy? Dave Dennis (Mar 25)