funsec mailing list archives
RE: Apple's lawyer: iTunes sells data, not music
From: James Kehl <shykta () dione ids pl>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:49:39 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Larry Seltzer wrote:
Apple Computer lead counsel Anthony Grabiner argued that themarket-leading iTunes music store was primarily a data transmission service, permitted by the agreement. Aren't music CDs just data?
Isn't everything data? There's an interesting topic over on Bruce Schneier's blog about Monolith - the idea that if you can XOR together two random bitstreams to get a Britney Spears mp3, then that mp3 must somehow have become public domain. Most of the commenters are saying something like: maybe the random bitstreams can't be proven to infringe, but if someone uses them to produce something humanly indistinguishable to a copyrighted work, they can/will be busted. Clearly, Apple Records (and the RIAA) need to go after speaker manufacturers - everyone else is pushing around bits and voltages :) James _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Apple's lawyer: iTunes sells data, not music Richard M. Smith (Mar 30)
- RE: Apple's lawyer: iTunes sells data, not music Larry Seltzer (Mar 30)
- RE: Apple's lawyer: iTunes sells data, not music James Kehl (Mar 31)
- RE: Apple's lawyer: iTunes sells data, not music Blanchard_Michael (Mar 31)
- RE: Apple's lawyer: iTunes sells data, not music James Kehl (Mar 31)
- Re: Apple's lawyer: iTunes sells data, not music Drsolly (Mar 30)
- RE: Apple's lawyer: iTunes sells data, not music Larry Seltzer (Mar 30)