funsec mailing list archives
RE: Was the WMF flaw intentional?
From: Josh Daymont <jdaymont () secureworks net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:23:29 -0500
I've seen some people grasp at straws to explain how vulnerabilities got into software from time to time but this has to take the cake. The idea that someone with the wherewithal to backdoor Windows would use something as completely obvious -- and stoppable -- and patchable as the SetAbortProc issue is nuts.
-----Original Message----- From: Richard M. Smith [mailto:rms () computerbytesman com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 1:05 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: [funsec] Was the WMF flaw intentional? << Message: >> << File: ATT1502221.txt >>
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Was the WMF flaw intentional? Richard M. Smith (Jan 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Was the WMF flaw intentional? Josh Daymont (Jan 13)