funsec mailing list archives
Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up?
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:14:31 GMT
That's a very good question. And there are several lawsuits pending to find out just that fact. - ferg -- "Jerry Hill" <malaclypse2 () gmail com> wrote: On 5/15/06, Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
I'm saying that, given the choice of taking the legal, questionable end-game path -- where you might not get what you want -- and the illegal, (perhaps) difficult path of being certain that you _will_ get what you want, you get the picture.
Well, okay, that's the part I don't understand. What is the downside of following the legal path here? -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Brian Loe (May 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? StyleWar (May 15)