funsec mailing list archives
Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor
From: Juha-Matti Laurio <juha-matti.laurio () netti fi>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:52:46 +0200 (EET)
This has been confirmed as totally new, third zero-day vulnerability in Word, which is the reason of missing protection with the most recent McAfee DATs etc. Related SecuriTeam entry has been updated. - Juha-MattiJuha-Matti Laurio <juha-matti.laurio () netti fi> wrote:
The current result of VirusTotal scan of Word 0-day PoC file 12122006-djtest.doc is extremely poor. One AV vendor of 29 has a protection available. This Proof of Concept file was publicly released on Tuesday 12th December and link to the release was posted to widely known security mailing list. More at http://blogs.securiteam.com/?p=763 - Juha-Matti
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Juha-Matti Laurio (Dec 13)
- it isn't a 0day Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Gadi Evron (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Juha-Matti Laurio (Dec 13)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Gadi Evron (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Gadi Evron (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Brian Loe (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Gadi Evron (Dec 14)