funsec mailing list archives

Re: [privacy] 'Devastating' Trial Results for Controversial Artificial Blood Product


From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:04:25 GMT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Dennis Henderson" <hendomatic () gmail com> wrote:

The wording in this article is *so* drive-by-media...

So what is a control group in this case? How does one make a decision that
"even though most of this person's blood is on the ground, "we'll wait for
blood typing and just fill them up with saline and hope for the best."
Seems like playing god in this case is a bad thing either way.   


Your tone here suggests that you think the "evil media" has made
too much of this little incident. Is that the case?

If you took the time to read the background on this issue, you'd
see that people have been trying to raise issues about this blood
"replacement" for well over a year, and the fact that medical warnings
went unheeded, and people's lives were put at risk again and again,
without their consent, is clearly criminal.

Surely you don't blame the media for exposing this, do you?

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.2 (Build 4075)

wj8DBQFFikADq1pz9mNUZTMRApz+AKChY9+6UQNJCQFvHkYKB2Pwtol4pwCgmt3s
W8WuwuXrqkfkaePkx9FHRJM=
=NggQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy


Current thread: