funsec mailing list archives
Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:38:34 -0500
On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, silky <michaelslists () gmail com> wrote:
is this really news?
No, but if doubleclick is messing up then well we are kinda screwed. I just thought it was funny, even if unavoidable :-) On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, silky <michaelslists () gmail com> also wrote:
orly?
On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, Dude <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> didn't get it <whoosh!>:
let's also not forget that ad's themselves are viral in nature. tricking us into trusting the products they promote so that they can exploit our wallets ...
Ahh the benefits of applied psychology: It only works on the weak of mind.. -JP< Who heads off to McDonalds in his new Scion listening to > < the latest Brittany Spears album on his iPhone via iTunes > _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Paul Ferguson (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Dude VanWinkle (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Dude VanWinkle (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Dude VanWinkle (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Dude VanWinkle (Nov 12)
- RE: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Larry Seltzer (Nov 12)
- RE: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Alex Eckelberry (Nov 12)
- RE: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Larry Seltzer (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Brian Loe (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- A recent candidate to the Darwin Award Remo Cornali (Nov 13)
- Re: A recent candidate to the Darwin Award Brian Loe (Nov 13)