funsec mailing list archives
The Inexact Science Behind DMCA Takedown Notices
From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:09:34 -0400
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/the-inexact-science-behind-dmca-tak edown-notices/index.html?ref=technology June 5, 2008, 11:18 am The Inexact Science Behind DMCA Takedown Notices By Brad <http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/author/bstone/> Stone A new <http://dmca.cs.washington.edu/> study from the University of Washington suggests that media industry trade groups are using flawed tactics in their investigations of users who violate copyrights on peer-to-peer file sharing networks. Those trade groups, including the Motion Picture Association of America (M.P.A.A.) Entertainment Software Association (E.S.A.) and Recording Industry Association of America (R.I.A.A.), send universities and other network operators an <http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/riaa-sends-spik.html> increasing number of takedown notices each year, alleging that their intellectual property rights have been violated under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Many universities pass those letters directly on to students without questioning the veracity of the allegations. The R.I.A.A. in particular follows up some of those notices by threatening legal action and forcing alleged file-sharers into a financial settlement. But the study, released Thursday by Tadayoshi Kohno <http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/yoshi/> , an assistant professor, Michael Piatek <http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/piatek/> a graduate student, and Arvind <http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/arvind> Krishnamurthy, a research assistant professor, all at the University of Washington, argues that perhaps those takedown notices should be viewed more skeptically. The paper finds that there is a serious flaw in how these trade groups finger alleged file-sharers. It also suggests that some people might be getting improperly accused of sharing copyrighted content, and could even be purposely framed by other users. In two separate studies in August of 2007 and May of this year, the researchers set out to examine who was participating in BitTorrent file-sharing networks and what they were sharing. The researchers introduced software agents into these networks to monitor their traffic. Even though those software agents did not download any files, the researchers say they received over 400 take-down requests accusing them of participating in the downloads. The researchers concluded that enforcement agencies are looking only at I.P. addresses of participants on these peer-to-peer networks, and not what files are actually downloaded or uploaded-a more resource-intensive process that would nevertheless yield more conclusive information. ...
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- The Inexact Science Behind DMCA Takedown Notices Richard M. Smith (Jun 06)
- Re: The Inexact Science Behind DMCA Takedown Notices der Mouse (Jun 06)