funsec mailing list archives
Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:36:38 -0500
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:44:37 EST, Larry Seltzer said:
hack? If not, I don't see the relevance, and I certainly don't see why the New York Times of all places, the defendant in the Pentagon Papers case, should feel they can't publish them
You *do* realize that the NYT misplaced most of their collective journalistic cojones sometime during the last few decades, right? Though they *did* run with the NSA monitoring story, there is oh so much else that's happened in recent years that the old NYT would have run with that the current paper has just yawned at. (Flaming response from the conservatives in 5..4..3.. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Gadi Evron (Dec 16)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul Ferguson (Dec 16)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Larry Seltzer (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul M Moriarty (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Larry Seltzer (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul M Moriarty (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Larry Seltzer (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul M Moriarty (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul M Moriarty (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 17)