funsec mailing list archives
Re: truth is for Admins
From: "Les Bell" <lesbell () lesbell com au>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:50:26 +1100
Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
It's been repeatedly shown that if you restrict yourself to the sort of training you can do and remain employed (no training at gunpoint, etc), you'll be lucky if half of the users retain a significant portion of your message. << That's probably true, but if user screwups account for, say, 90% of breaches, then if half the users clean up their act, that will account for a 45% improvement in the situation? (Yeah, and if we had some bacon, we could have bacon and eggs, if we had some eggs. But you get the point . . . ) Best, --- Les Bell [http://www.lesbell.com.au] Tel: +61 2 9451 1144 _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- truth is for Admins RandallM (Oct 23)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Message not available
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins John Bambenek (Oct 25)
- Message not available
- Re: truth is for Admins RandallM (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: truth is for Admins Les Bell (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Rich Kulawiec (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins chris (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins Nick FitzGerald (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins chris (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins Rich Kulawiec (Oct 26)