funsec mailing list archives

Re: vulnerability overstatement


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:23:01 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Larry Seltzer <larry () larryseltzer com>
wrote:

BTW, the fact that it's comparatively reliable on XP doesn't impress me
anymore. Running XP is like driving without a seatbelt. If you get
compromised you're complicit in it.


Well, that's not necessarily true -- in fact, van be completely untrue.

Some people can use XP and secure it quite well. :-)

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFLV6xwq1pz9mNUZTMRAob1AKC3ewUOmGWLhHInRXDadDRZCU1pvgCff2iv
cYLvXKELh/ePcKLLhGZdS30=
=c+St
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: