funsec mailing list archives

Re: B.C. judge certifies class-action suit for men denied gambling winnings


From: "Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah" <rmslade () shaw ca>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:29:22 -0800

Date sent:              Sat, 12 Jan 2013 06:45:23 -0500
From:                   Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>

How do lotteries and casinos work in Canada?

Gaming is regulated by the provinces.  In most, gaming licences are granted but 
dependent upon a certain proportion of the money going to charity.

Do lottery agents and
casinos make you sign a self-exclusion agreement before playing?

Note the word "voluntary."  Note the phrase "self-exclusion."  This was a 
program intended to address problem gamblers.  You could (voluntarily) sign a self-
exclusion agreement, which meant that you couldn't collect any winnings.  Thus, 
no incentive to gamble, so most people wouldn't.  (No, I don't know how it is 
policed.)  Obviously, these guys signed the agreement as problem gamblers, but 
then started to think they could "game" the system.

And this week, B.C. Supreme Court Justice John Savage ruled there were
sufficient grounds to certify a class-action for winners denied
because they were in the self-exclusion program.

I suppose there must be some legal reason why the suit was OKed, but it seems 
stupid.  They agreed not to collect: they didn't collect.


======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rslade () vcn bc ca     slade () victoria tc ca     rslade () computercrime org
Just about every computer on the market today runs UNIX, except
the Mac (and nobody cares about it).       - Bill Joy, 6/21/85
victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://www.infosecbc.org/links
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
http://twitter.com/rslade
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: