Honeypots mailing list archives
Re: Honeyd Censorship
From: Seth Arnold <sarnold () wirex com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:51:10 -0700
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:32:41AM -0700, Jeremy Bennett wrote:
What portion of this new amendment does honeyd purportedly violate?
The law outlaws technologies that obscure the source or destination of digital communications from carriers. Honeyd can be configured to fake the presense of entire networks. That sounds like obscuring the source or destination to me. But then, I'm not a lawyer recognized by the bar in any of the states that have passed such laws. -- United States of America: The world leader in short-sighted policy!
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Honeyd Censorship John Lyons (Apr 10)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Byrne Ghavalas (Apr 10)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Jeremy Bennett (Apr 10)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Seth Arnold (Apr 10)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Niels Provos (Apr 15)
- Jail Time for Honeypots? Eko Sulistyo (Apr 19)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? George Chamales (Apr 19)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Bernie, CTA (Apr 20)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Octavian POPESCU (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Fernando Martins (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? yannick san (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Kevin Saenz (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Jimi Thompson (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? InformationSecurity (Apr 22)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Seth Arnold (Apr 10)