Honeypots mailing list archives
Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots.
From: raymond <ip_raymond () yahoo com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 06:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
--- Kostas K <acezerocool () yahoo com> wrote: In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309072022340.18729-100000 () marge spitzner net> Hi Kostas, Why don't we use both IDS and Honeypot together ? As a matter of fact, given the traffic loading and correction of events, would it be more easily for administrator to do the cross-validation with both tools. regards, Raymond. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Current thread:
- Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 05)
- RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 06)
- RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 06)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 07)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Lance Spitzner (Sep 07)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 08)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. raymond (Sep 08)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Curt Purdy (Sep 08)
- RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 08)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. raymond (Sep 08)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 09)