Honeypots mailing list archives
RE: Honeypots & reccord industry
From: "Roger A. Grimes" <roger () banneretcs com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:37:46 -0500
You are correct with your comments and fruit of the poisonous tree logic. I should have known my two semesters of business law didn't make me a lawyer. Thanks for the compliment on the book. -----Original Message----- From: Austin, Richard D [mailto:richard.austin () hp com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 3:22 PM To: Roger A. Grimes; honeypots () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Honeypots & reccord industry Hello Roger, While I, like you, am of the opinion that people shouldn't be illegally downloading copyrighted material, I would be a bit more concerned about (in the US anyway) running afoul of the ECPA (PL 99-508) with such a practice. Considering the RIAA as a "service provider" using the honeynet under the service-provider exemption would seem a bit of a stretch to me. Regards entrapment, courts take a rather jaundiced view of evidence that was collected illegally and then used to guide the collection of "legal evidence" -- they tend to regard the whole bunch as "fruit of a poisonous tree" and exclude it (assuming defending counsel gets real curious about how it was they just happened to decide to look at that particular place/item/etc). These types of issues are why an attorney (which I are not) is a real good place to start when setting up one of these things if any of the results may become evidence in a legal proceeding. With all the RIAA's $$, I would assume they've done that but you just never know. Incidentally, sincere compliments on your excellent book! Best regards. -----Original Message----- From: Roger A. Grimes [mailto:roger () banneretcs com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 10:23 AM To: honeypots () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Honeypots & reccord industry I don't remember the source, but I have read this several times. I don't think it is a secret. People should not be illegally downloading copyrighted material, so I don't see the problem. A courtcase based on evidence collected from one of these honeypots might finally test the entrapment defense theory...but the RIAA would probably just use the evidence collected to track other more certain types of evidence. Roger ******************************************************************* *Roger A. Grimes, Banneret Computer Security, Consultant *CPA, CISSP, MCSE: Security (2000/2003/MVP), CEH, yada...yada... *email: roger () banneretcs com *Author of Honeypots for Windows (Apress) *http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=281 ******************************************************************* -----Original Message----- To: Bruno Joho Cc: honeypots () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Honeypots & reccord industry Bruno Joho wrote:
Hi folks It came to my ears the reccord industry is collecting information about people sharing music files or publishing such files for download. They may using honeypot technology to get the data needed for proceedings judicially. Does anybody knows more about?
Current thread:
- Honeypots & reccord industry Bruno Joho (Dec 18)
- Re: Honeypots & reccord industry Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (Dec 19)
- RE: Honeypots & reccord industry David Watson (Dec 19)
- Re: Honeypots & reccord industry Alexander Klimov (Dec 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Honeypots & reccord industry Roger A. Grimes (Dec 19)
- Re: Honeypots & reccord industry Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 19)
- Re: Honeypots & reccord industry Kevin Bryan (Dec 20)
- Re: Honeypots & reccord industry erdem (Dec 19)
- RE: Honeypots & reccord industry Austin, Richard D (Dec 19)
- RE: Honeypots & reccord industry Roger A. Grimes (Dec 19)
- Re: Honeypots & reccord industry Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (Dec 19)