Honeypots mailing list archives
RE: honeywall/pot on same host
From: "William Woodhams" <William.Woodhams () wegmans com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:14:36 -0400
I personally prefer having it on two different systems. Reason being I can monitor both of them separately and if I need to I can restart my honeywall without having to affect my honeypot itself. Also it allows me to report on if the honeywall was breached only or if someone actually got into the honeypot. Bill Woodhams Systems Technician Development Group-Technical Systems (585)429-3183 William.Woodhams () wegmans com Newcastle United signs Michael Owen...Enough Said! -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Mike Gilligan Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:07 AM To: honeypots () securityfocus com Subject: honeywall/pot on same host Hi list Could anyone weight in on or point me to a resource which confirms whether a single host can be used for the honeywall and honeypot systems or if it is recommended to have separate physical machines for each and why. thanks, Mike. _________________________________________________________________ Get cheap fares online with MSN Travel http://www.msn.com.sg/travel/
Current thread:
- honeywall/pot on same host Mike Gilligan (Sep 27)
- Re: honeywall/pot on same host David Watson (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: honeywall/pot on same host William Woodhams (Sep 27)