Security Incidents mailing list archives
a very strange scan
From: sluskyb () STWING UPENN EDU (Boris Badenov)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:26:11 -0000
I was scanned yesterday by 208.225.90.120 (which is somewhere in the depths of UUnet) on the following ports: 46424 17699 54510 53021 2168 38979 45576 16851 44087 15362 21752 20263 57074 28349 65160 26860 43032 4732 41543 11329 48140 All these ports are unassigned, and none of them are on any of the trojan lists I've found. Can anyone make sense of this? TIA, - -Ben
Current thread:
- UDP to 161, (continued)
- UDP to 161 CL: Nelson, Jeff (Feb 10)
- Re: UDP to 161 Pavel Kankovsky (Feb 15)
- Re: UDP to 161 Ryan Russell (Feb 15)
- Re: UDP to 161 CyberPsychotic (Feb 16)
- Re: UDP to 161 Russell Fulton (Feb 15)
- Re: Private networks and home.{net|com} Andy Smith (Feb 09)
- massive unapproved AXFR's and odd rcvd NOTIFY's Paul Wouters (Feb 09)
- Re: massive unapproved AXFR's and odd rcvd NOTIFY's Francis A. Vidal (Feb 09)
- [UPDATE]Dos Trojan on Solaris Roderick Padilla (Feb 09)
- Re: [UPDATE]Dos Trojan on Solaris Ross Mueller (Feb 09)
- a very strange scan Boris Badenov (Feb 09)
- Re: a very strange scan Russell Fulton (Feb 10)
- Possible stacheldraht variant/probe Stephen P. Berry (Feb 09)
- Re: Possible stacheldraht variant/probe David Brumley (Feb 10)
- Re: [UPDATE]Dos Trojan on Solaris Robert Lau (Feb 09)
- Re: Strange traceroute Rob Quinn (Feb 08)
- vi as a suid Paulo Ribeiro (Feb 08)
- Re: Strange traceroute Hauke Johannknecht (Feb 08)
- Re: sendmail vunerability ? CyberPsychotic (Feb 07)