Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: A question for the list...
From: "Jay D. Dyson" <jdyson () treachery net>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 22 May 2003, Jimi Thompson wrote:
And who gets to choose who gets on the Internet-version of the WHO? Who pays for it? What if I'm Chinese and everyone on there is from the USA? I might not want a bunch of foreign nationals telling me I have to install software "or else". What if I'm the USA and everyone on there is from Iran, Sudan, Syria, and Libya? I might not want the software they are offering either. You set us on a slippery slope.
I think it's safe to say that we can skip any ideas of a world governing body (apart from technical standards) on any part of the Internet. Setting specs on hardware is one thing; setting specs on operation only gets people ornery.
I personally favor litigation.
Such an approach serves no purpose but to punish consumers in this increasingly turbo-litigious world. Whenever a business is sued, that just cuts into their bottom line and that of their insurer's. As a consequence, we (the end users and consumers) see increased fees for the same service from both the defendant business and their insurance firm so that they can underwrite the cost of the lawyers, lawsuits and the resulting awards/penalties. Bottom line: the 'net was built in a time when all participants played nice in the sandbox. The very foundations of the networks on which we rely are absent any sense of security paranoia. Neither laws nor lawsuits will solve this. What is the solution? Beats me...but I guarantee you that we won't EVER solve this 21st century problem using 20th century tactics. - -Jay ( ( _______ )) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"-. >====<--. C|~~|C|~~| (>----- Jay D. Dyson -- jdyson () treachery net -----<) | = |-' `--' `--' `------- There is no patch for stupidity. -------' `------' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (TreacherOS) Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys. iD8DBQE+zmL5Nlg1oZSC9mkRAhPRAJ9ma+s21JI0hVAsOs2gb6dVYEn38QCeOBzd +jmBJX+49Bkn9ter0M07uPM= =d0NA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper *** Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats. Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs. To get your FREE white paper visit us at: http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: A question for the list..., (continued)
- Re: A question for the list... Ed Shirey (May 17)
- RE: A question for the list... Dan Perez (May 19)
- Re: A question for the list... Ray Stirbei (May 19)
- RE: A question for the list... Benjamin Tomhave (May 21)
- Re: A question for the list... Kevin Reardon (May 20)
- RE: A question for the list... Mark Ng (May 21)
- Re: A question for the list... Kevin Reardon (May 21)
- RE: A question for the list... Rob Shein (May 22)
- Re: A question for the list... Gary Flynn (May 21)
- Re: A question for the list... Jimi Thompson (May 23)
- Re: A question for the list... Jay D. Dyson (May 25)
- Re: A question for the list... Ed Shirey (May 17)
- Re: A question for the list... Andy Shelley (May 20)
- RE: A question for the list... John McCracken (May 20)
- Re: A question for the list... Anders Reed Mohn (May 20)
- Re: A question for the list... Ray Stirbei (May 21)
- RE: A question for the list... Bojan Zdrnja (May 26)
- Re: A question for the list... Chip Mefford (May 21)