Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Releasing patches is bad for security
From: Joe Miller <joseph-p-miller () cox net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:48:37 -0500
I would hope MS has hundreds of the brightest software engineers specifically focused on finding security flaws in all of their software. They should also hire third party security engineers to do the same until all security holes are discovered, code rewrites planned, designed and deployed before the company chokes to death on it's own mistakes. They certainly have enough liquid assets to do so. They also have enough cash to then hire the brightest security and software engineers to develop OS's and Applications while incorporating security specs, reasonable care and due diligence. Developing the security controls with the OS and applications is the only way Microsoft will survive as a software company of the future. ============================================================ From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton () chrisbrenton org> Date: 2004/02/26 Thu PM 01:31:03 EST To: incidents () securityfocus com Subject: Releasing patches is bad for security Greets all, This is just such a hoot I had to share: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3485972.stm The story quotes David Aucsmith, who is in charge of technology at Microsoft's security business and technology unit as stating: "We have never had vulnerabilities exploited before the patch was known," The story then goes on to talk about how vulnerabilities are always reverse engineered from patches. It really sounds to me like he's saying that patches are *the* problem and if only Microsoft would stop releasing patches, then all the security issues would just go away. Microsoft has already dropped down to a monthly patch system. Even then they have already been skipping months. Could this be early PR spin to justify not releasing security patches? C --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================================================ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security, (continued)
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security Curt Purdy (Feb 26)
- Re: Releasing patches is bad for security Pall Thayer (Feb 26)
- Re: Releasing patches is bad for security mgotts (Feb 26)
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security Ross M. W. Bennetts (Feb 26)
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security Brian Taylor (Feb 29)
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security Ross M. W. Bennetts (Feb 26)
- Re: Releasing patches is bad for security james (Feb 26)
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security ELLIS, STEVEN (Feb 27)
- Re: Releasing patches is bad for security james (Feb 27)
- Re: Releasing patches is bad for security Meritt James (Feb 27)
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security ELLIS, STEVEN (Feb 27)
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security Gary Nichols (Feb 26)
- Re: Releasing patches is bad for security Joe Miller (Feb 29)
- RE: Releasing patches is bad for security Curt Purdy (Feb 26)