Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Uptick in telnetd scanners - possible worm activity.
From: "Jonathan Upperman" <jupperman () lubasif com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:23:09 -0500
Hello - Im guessing the activity you're seeing is probably closely related to the cisco telnet DoS vulnerability as described in the advisory that cisco released 4-5 days ago: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040827-telnet.shtml - just a thought... could be coincidental. thanks Jonathan M. Upperman Network Engineer SIF Consultants of LA, Inc. http://www.lubasif.com 225.389.5822 jupperman () lubasif com
-----Original Message----- From: Jay D. Dyson [mailto:jdyson () treachery net] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 9:53 PM To: Incidents List Subject: Uptick in telnetd scanners - possible worm activity. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Don't recall seeing this discussed previously on this list (or any other), so I'm passing this along to compare notes. I've seen an extraordinary uptick in telnetd scans in the past nine days. The first came around the morning of August 21 from Thailand. Then things went quiet, but today I've seen a large flurry of telnetd connect attempts from a load of systems (nearly all of them from -- surprise! -- Asia). A sampling of IP addresses hitting telnetd on systems across my networks are: 61.238.125.96 CTIHK (Hong Kong) 61.238.173.194 CTIHK (Hong Kong) 62.141.251.101 MULTIMEDIA-POLSKA-1 (Poland) 202.183.209.47 CSCOM-TH (Thailand) 203.174.213.97 KMN (Japan) 218.28.9.164 HA-ZZ-ELECTRICPOWER-CORP (China) 218.52.89.24 HANANET (South Korea) 218.92.213.66 CHINANET-JS (China) 219.157.172.204 CNCGROUP-HA (China) 221.127.87.94 HGC (Hong Kong) 222.88.132.1 CHINATELECOM-HA (China) 222.137.41.79 CNCGROUP-HA (China) Considering the slow start following by the volume I've seen today, I'm thinking this might be some kind of worm. The distribution and repetition volume of attack does not lead me to believe that we simply have hyperactive ankle-biters here...though I'm not sure why a worm would be looking for telnetd. I should hope that no *nix distros, firewalls or routers still ship with that service enabled. - -Jay ( ( _______ )) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"-. >====<--. C|~~|C|~~| (>----- Jay D. Dyson -- jdyson () treachery net -----<) | = |-' `--' `--' `------ Stick around; I may need an alibi. ------' `------' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (TreacherOS) Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys. iD8DBQFBM+gu6uxsHJ5aYG4RAmkgAJ9XWvK4xlx2zJXdUDyLmt80X1xNCgCeP5FQ Z9oN21y8WFFqlolITAMoQSA= =y5Ne -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- RE: Uptick in telnetd scanners - possible worm activity. Donahue, Pat (Sep 01)
- Re: Uptick in telnetd scanners - possible worm activity. Andy Cuff (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Uptick in telnetd scanners - possible worm activity. Jonathan Upperman (Sep 04)