Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: I will bet someone on Clinton's panel $1000 that date changes do not affect packet forwarding in any substantial part of the Internet
From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 22:34:22 -0400
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:05:33 -0400 To: farber () cis upenn edu From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed () reed com> Subject: I will bet someone on Clinton's panel $1000 that date changes do not affect packet forwarding in any substantial part of the Internet Dave - you may post this on IP. Subject to appropriate terms, I will make this bet. Perhaps you would like to hold the money. The category error that causes people to equate "noncompliant" (which means that a legal review has not occurred) with "will probably fail" is an example of the poor (and frequently self serving) logic that passes for. The idea that there is an substantive analysis AT ALL behind this press conference is suspect. No doubt there will be some failures. But internet packet forwarding has almost nothing to do with dates, and date failures have not been shown to lead to computer crashes, though they often affect data. - David -------------------------------------------- WWW Page: http://www.reed.com/dpr.html
Current thread:
- IP: I will bet someone on Clinton's panel $1000 that date changes do not affect packet forwarding in any substantial part of the Internet Dave Farber (Aug 17)