Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: more on How America is Falling Behind in Race for Fast Access
From: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 19:53:21 -0400
A bit of background. Joe worked with me at Bell Labs in the 60s . Real smart person. I have had equivalent discussions with very senior people in the RBOCs. If peopl,e disagree and I suspect many will, please send me a cogent argument not a "religious" one. dave
From: "Joseph H. Weber" <jweber () spri com> To: <farber () cis upenn edu> Subject: Re: How America is Falling Behind in Race for Fast Access Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:47:03 -0400 Although the US may (or may not) be falling behind in deployment of high speed access, I'm not much impressed by the evidence presented in your note. Announcements are cheap - there have been many announcements of plans for high speed access made by AT&T and several Bell companies. If there is a governmental failure here, it may have more to do with the reguolatory constraints placed on the industrey than the lack of governmental initiatives. The Bells don't have much incentive to open their networks, or to provide high speed access, if they are forced to make their facil.lities available to competitors at prices they judge to be below cost. Similarly, AT&T is being hassled by its competitors to let them benefit equally from any investment it makes in cable technology. There may be some merit in some of these positions, but rapid deployment of high spoeed access is not one of the outcomes. By the way, it's perfectly possible for a line to be unusable for ADSL, but perfectly OK for basic rate ISDN . T1.ordinarily involves some conditioning, which the companies are perfectly willing to make, since the price will justify the cost. Joe Weber Strategic Policy Research -----Original Message----- From: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu> To: ip-sub-1 () admin listbox com <ip-sub-1 () admin listbox com> Date: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 8:05 PM Subject: IP: How America is Falling Behind in Race for Fast AccessDate: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 11:44:15 -0400 To: OpenDTV Mail List <OpenDTV () pcube com> From: Craig Birkmaier <craig () pcube com> An interesting commentary from jesse Berst at ZDNet... How America is Falling Behind in Race for Fast Access Jesse Berst, Editorial Director ZDNet AnchorDesk Producers of "The Blair Witch Project" caught Hollywood moguls off-guard. Promoting the low-budget film online proved to be a smart move. Another project: Global Fast Access is playing on other continents. And is catching America off-guard. Americans love to gloat over the strength of the free-market system. The best products at the best prices. The highest standard of living. The envy of the world. But the system has failed when it comes to fast Internet access. Just as "Blair Witch" leapfrogged the traditional Hollywood system, so too several other countries are leapfrogging the U.S. in the race to wire the planet with fast connections. The stakes are high. The winners will dominate in the first half of the next century. WHO IS GETTING AHEAD The fast-access leaders include: Singapore: The government's number one project is to connect phone lines with the cable TV network through high-frequency optical cable lines. <http://www.nua.ie/surveys/analysis/weekly_editorial/archives/issue1no 85.html>Click for more. Malaysia: They're building an ambitious high-tech zone called the Multimedia Super Corridor, which is to become a testing ground for new information technology and multimedia systems. <http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2289969,00.html>Click for more. Great Britain: Phone giant British Telecom announced a recent big investment in <http://www.anchordesk.com/glossary/glossary_24.html>DSL with the goal of making Britain a world leader in the information revolution. WHAT WENT WRONG IN THE U.S.? Blame for slow rollout in the U.S. is shared by many: Baby Bells have refused to implement the 1996 Telecommunications Act. That's slowed competition, hampering independent companies in their efforts to offer fast access. <http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_2799.html>Click for more. I experienced it first-hand when I tried to get DSL service from an independent provider. But the phone company said it couldn't provide the service because of "problems" with the line. However the line was good enough for them to offer me expensive <http://www.anchordesk.com/glossary/glossary_44.html>ISDN or <http://www.anchordesk.com/glossary/glossary_176.html>T1 service. No thanks. Low-budget cable companies have let their systems languish. Many are way out of date and not capable of offering fast access. Yesterday's announced Viacom-CBS deal should bring faster cable upgrades, but it's still taking way too long. Inability to agree on technical standards has also hurt the push for fast access. Lucent's announcement yesterday of its Stinger technology is exactly the technical advance we couldn't get before. <http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2329469,00.html>Click for more A government that just doesn't get it. The Clinton Administration worries about security issues and encryption. And it should. But it has failed to coordinate or promote a plan for wide use of fast access. Similarly, presidential candidate Al Gore (the man who "took the initiative in creating the Internet," remember <http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/03/09/president.2000/transcri pt.gore/>click for more) has yet to push for creating the infrastructure for a "digital nation." It's simple really: First build the highways for high-speed data, sound and video. But so far, the U.S. government has done little to prime the pump or offer the private sector incentives to take the financial risks involved in fast access. You thought "Blair Witch" was frightening. What's really scary is watching a tech powerhouse like the U.S. lose the fast-access race because it didn't bother to build the proper foundations.
Current thread:
- IP: more on How America is Falling Behind in Race for Fast Access David Farber (Sep 19)