Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: RE: G-8 OFFICIALS CONSIDER TREATY FOR CYBERCRIME LAWS
From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 16:27:17 -0400
I will let the readers determine whether the actions of many have been trying to undermine the BofR. Dave
From: "Baker, Stewart" <SBaker () steptoe com> To: "'farber () cis upenn edu'" <farber () cis upenn edu> cc: "Albertazzie, Sally" <SAlbertazzie () steptoe com> [ I wonder if the law they say " U.S. law enforcement groups are also hamstrung by laws that allow cybercriminals to escape detection and capture." is also called the Bill of Rights djf] That's not fair, Dave. I don't know any Justice officials who would criticize the Bill of Rights as hamstringing law enforcement. More likely this is a reference to the lack of procedures for a nationwide "trap and trace" order that would allow the government to track hackers from one US host to another without having to get a separate order in a local court for each host. It's fair to ask questions about this Justice proposal, but I haven't heard anyone argue that it violates the Bill of Rights.
Current thread:
- IP: RE: G-8 OFFICIALS CONSIDER TREATY FOR CYBERCRIME LAWS Dave Farber (May 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: IP: RE: G-8 OFFICIALS CONSIDER TREATY FOR CYBERCRIME LAWS Dave Farber (May 20)