Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: More spectrum for military!!??


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:52:21 -0400



Dave,
An article listed below

http://www.msnbc.com/news/607031.asp

by MSNBC would indicate to me that the military would not allow the auctioning
of valuable spectrum off to meet the wireless industries needs. Communications
for the military has always been and always will be too valuable for this kind
of wholesale auction.

                      "China's emerging IW capability was first
                      detected during an October 1998 exercise
                      conducted in the Lanzhou Military Region in the
                      far west of China, where an electronic
                      "confrontation" was simulated, including
                      reconnaissance, interference and destruction.
                      Chinese engineers are also known to have
                      conducted experiments in introducing viruses
                      into adversaries' computer systems from long
                      distances via wireless means".

also,

                      "This turns unassuming aircraft like the Navy
                      EP-3 into cutting-edge weapons. They are able
                      to get closer to intelligence targets than satellites
                      or land stations, positioning themselves in what
                      one signals intelligence expert calls the "antenna
                      alleys" and "side-lobes" of adversary systems -
                      that is, the areas where microwave and other
                      signals traverse the air and might be able to be
                      intercepted".
                             "For now, the United States is the only
                      country with the computer capabilities and
                      resources to put all of the pieces together".

This new warfare will demand additional spectrum and a lot of it. I actually
think that the military will be asking for more.



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: