Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: trapped in the system


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:53:00 -0500



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40563-2002Jan25.html

Abtracted for review:

The federal government has had Oulai in custody since Sept. 14, the day flight manuals and a stun gun were found in his luggage at a Florida airport and he was arrested as a suspected terrorist.

Since September, the Bush administration has followed a policy of concealment in his case and in those of hundreds of other foreigners similarly detained in the terrorism investigation.

Oulai is the first material witness who has managed to talk publicly from detention about his experience -- an experience that has taken him through the immigration system and a series of unconventional legal maneuvers that have kept him within the government's grasp.

At certain facilities where he has been held, administrators say they are not at liberty to confirm whether he was ever there.

His attorneys have been unable to procure copies of some legal documents that government attorneys have drafted to hold him in custody.

And his family and a legal representative for the Ivory Coast Embassy have been not been allowed inside the several courtrooms in which government attorneys have pursued their case against him.

"There is nothing about this case that we can discuss publicly."

Oulai, however, did so during 10 telephone conversations over the past month, and during a 45-minute visit at the jail one January evening.

The outlines and crucial details of his case have been verified by his attorneys; by local law enforcement officials, relatives and acquaintances; by a half-dozen people who have been questioned about him by the FBI, and by government documents that The Washington Post has obtained.

From such varied strands, however, it remains unclear why an investigation into a terrorist plot carried out by young Muslim extremists has implicated a 34-year-old Roman Catholic from West Africa.

He had booked a bargain Southwest Airlines flight out of Jacksonville, figuring it was worth the 5 1/2-hour drive.

He had just settled into a seat at Gate C-1 when two officers approached, according to a Jacksonville Port Authority police report of his arrest.

With his cell phone, he called a paralegal he knew in Philadelphia, another Ivory Coast native, to say he might need legal help.

There was no sign of a Tony Oulai in custody.

By then, a lawyer was also looking for him: Frank Lindner, a Philadelphia immigration attorney who works with the paralegal whom Oulai had called from Jacksonville.

SHU detainees are allowed from their cells for a shower every few days, for occasional phone calls and for exercise two hours a week.

Oulai had told them beforehand that he had put their names on a visitors list, in accord with the facility's rules.

On Oct. 10, the FBI issued an affidavit that federal prosecutors across the country have used to persuade judges that detainees in the terrorism probe should not be granted bond.

Using an unorthodox legal argument, the affidavit, signed by Michael Rolince, chief of the FBI's international terrorism section, says the investigation is "akin to the construction of a mosaic" and the involvement of any one suspect cannot be ruled out until the entire picture is understood.

In Oulai's case, the affidavit also contains what is, to this day, the only public government information about why investigators regard him as suspicious.

It focuses entirely on evidence from his arrest in Jacksonville -- the flight manuals, the stun gun and the Arabic-language materials that it says were in his checked luggage.

According to a spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration, guns, including stun guns, are permitted in checked luggage as long as they are unloaded, packed in a locked suitcase and disclosed to the airline -- which Oulai conceded he did not do.

Still, an immigration judge at Batavia ordered Oulai kept in custody.

Oulai's attorneys and family acknowledge an immigration violation on his part -- but not the one the INS alleged.

The government charged him with entering the country illegally; Oulai's attorneys have an entry document and work permits showing that he did not.

On Nov. 15, when Batavia's immigration judge ordered Oulai's deportation, Oulai promised he would not appeal.

That, Oulai and his attorneys thought, would end his legal dance with the U.S. government.

But four days later, federal law enforcement officials in Alexandria issued a new warrant, under seal.

Why, Sontan asked, was Oulai being held on a material witness warrant -- one that was based on a new, secret FBI affidavit that described him as Arabic when he clearly was a black African?

Sontan said Rolince got off the phone to check, then quickly called back to say that the U.S. attorney in Alexandria had issued the warrant and that it was out of his hands.

Using such a warrant so early in a case -- when a grand jury is still investigating, and particularly when the witness already is in federal custody -- was "cute," Kolken said.

Only in the final moments, he said, did the prosecutor mention Sept. 11.


For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: