Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Lessons from the Meltdown of U.S. Telephone Industry - Giving Top Priority to the Internet
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 10:18:59 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 21:10:53 -0500 To: dave () farber net Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com> Subject: Re: <[IP]> Lessons from the Meltdown of U.S. Telephone Industry - Giving Top Priority to the Internet Dave Farber <dave () farber net> writes:
[ I personally am distressed with the Prof. Noam proposal to allow cartels during recessions to "save" the industry. Djf]
To the consumer, the telecom crisis is no problem. I'm getting $.03 a minute nationwide long distance and $.07 a minute calling to Australia -- that's fine with me. The problem is only for the shareholders. In this regard, the problem in telecom may be the same as that in the airline industry, which is to say, "not a problem for the country". Airlines have gone bankrupt over and over since airline deregulation but there is no sign that this is a problem for consumers at all, who are more or less getting the least expensive flights that the industry can deliver. Similarly, commoditization etc. may be a problem for AT&T, but is it a problem for virtually everyone other than telecom sharehoders? It is fine if telecom is only a marginally profitable business from the consumer point of view. Plans to "save the industry" aren't needed, or, to put it another way, they're a great idea if you own telecom stock, but they do nothing for a couple hundred million telecom consumers. The real problem for consumers continues to be the stranglehold of the iLECs on the last mile, which among other things they used to destroy competition in DSL service. Breaking that lock might be bad for Verizon, but I doubt it will be a particular concern for me, any more than AT&T's decline causes me any worry. I'm sure the telecom industry will oppose even greater competition, but it is not a question of what is good for *them*, it is a question of what is in the interest of the general public. Perry ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To unsubscribe or update your address, click http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Lessons from the Meltdown of U.S. Telephone Industry - Giving Top Priority to the Internet Dave Farber (Nov 09)