Interesting People mailing list archives
AT&T Resorts to SPAM
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:12:39 -0400
------ Forwarded Message From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:27:06 -0700 (PDT) To: dave () farber net Cc: lauren () pfir org Subject: AT&T Resorts to SPAM Dave, It appears that AT&T has now begun a spamming campaign for their local service offering. Customers of other AT&T services (and quite possibly non-customers as well, it's hard to tell for sure) are getting promotional e-mailings via Bluestreak, apparently one of the Direct Marketing Associations' happy marketing members. The messages include references to domains such as http://www.prq0.com, and are arriving from domains like http://processrequest.com, both of which redirect to http://www.bluestreak.com. These mailings, which address the recipient as a current AT&T long distance customer, are reaching persons who have *not* provided AT&T with their e-mail addresses. If we assume that these are not random, scattershot mailings, it appears probable that some sort of data matching service may have been used to obtain these addresses for long distance customers who chose not to give AT&T their e-mail information in the first place. Of course, it's never a good policy to trust opt-out URLs in spam, but included within the messages is a long URL specified for future opt-outs. However, it is too long to paste properly (even in segments) into some newer Netscape browsers, at least from various text-based e-mail applications. Even with a compatible browser, attempts to access the opt-out URL yielded an unexplained error message from the server in my tests. The customer service telephone number provided for more information will not allow you to reach a person unless you provide a "phone number of interest" and would not function at all for persons not using touch-tone phones. No doubt AT&T would claim that their "prior business relationship" with customers would prevent such unsolicited e-mail communications from being categorized as spam, regardless of how they managed to get hold of the e-mail addresses in question. But if it looks like a spam and acts like a spam, it's still spam. Shame on you, AT&T. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () pfir org or lauren () vortex com or lauren () privacyforum org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, Fact Squad - http://www.factsquad.org Co-Founder, URIICA - Union for Representative International Internet Cooperation and Analysis - http://www.uriica.org Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- AT&T Resorts to SPAM Dave Farber (Oct 16)