Interesting People mailing list archives
-- more on -- What message are we sending?
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 06:10:58 -0400
My comment is Parson broke the law; knew he broke it and knew if caught he would get notoriety and punishment . Lets not start blaming IT managers and society for not defending themselves against people like him. They should of as we should have defended our nation against 9-11 but we did not and they do not.
I have less of a problem with house detention than the original author but strongly believe the book should get thrown at him unless there are mental problems. I , for one, am getting tired of seeing the net attacked for fun.
Dave
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 04:21:54 -0500 From: Mike Skallas <user245 () hotmail com> To: dave () farber net Dave, This piece you posted is sorely lacking in facts and insight. The accused has only been charged with writing a variant of the blaster virus; he is not its original author Fact: These crimes are punishable up to 10 years in prison. That is serious time for anyone. Fact: Many humanitarian groups consider solitary confinement inhumane. Fact: Kevin Mitnick, a hacker and common thief, is a hero to many of these kids. By pulling another heavy-handed Mitnick-like stunt the government could be paving the way to more cyber-attacks in the form of angry vigilantes who see the system as broken. Also, it is a waste of the taxpayer's money to treat a non-violent criminal just like a violent one. Not to mention the defense attorney will use the "abuse by the system" argument to win sympathy points with a jury if Parson is treated unfairly or treated illegally. The U.S. Attorney did the proper thing in treating this crime as it should be. By respecting due process and not giving in to hotheads like this IT manager everyone's rights are protected and a fair trial can be had. The question I have for this mysterious IT manager is: why was his network unprepared? At all of my client sites we filtered out the MSblaster and Sobig menaces through a variety of methods that were actually very inexpensive because we already bought equipment and software flexible enough to handle these types of attacks. It should be assumed that any WAN connection is hostile. Blaming Parson because one is incompetent at IT is ridiculous and using the "what message are we sending" rhetoric to appeal to emotion is shameless hate mongering and should not be tolerated in a liberal democracy that protects the rights of the individual. I think this post is below the standards of your otherwise fine IP list. I'd much rather read about long-term solutions to the problems of insecure computing in the residential markets, business taking net security seriously, etc. The assumption that "roughing up" one 18-year old will make a difference is simply false. Netizens need real long term solutions not simple harsh sentencing or "legislating from the bench" because of public pressure if they truly want to make it past the growing pains of the early stages of the information age. Michael Skallas http://everythingisnt.com
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- -- more on -- What message are we sending? Dave Farber (Aug 30)