Interesting People mailing list archives
here we go again with software patents -- Jury orders Microsoft to pay more than $520 million
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 20:58:52 -0400
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:51 -0700 From: Sean Peisert <peisert () sdsc edu> Subject: SF Gate: Jury orders Microsoft to pay more than $520 million Sender: nobody () sfgate com To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Dave: Of pertinent interest to Politech readers (and those of us who work for UC). -Sean ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SF Gate. The original article can be found on SFGate.com here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/08/11/national1835EDT0658.DTL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Monday, August 11, 2003 (AP) Jury orders Microsoft to pay more than $520 million MIKE ROBINSON, Associated Press Writer (08-11) 16:59 PDT CHICAGO (AP) -- A federal jury awarded a software company and the University of California more than $520 million in damages Monday after finding that Microsoft Corp.'s popular Internet Explorer browser infringed on a patent. Microsoft attorney Andy Culbert said that the jury's finding would be appealed. The jury could have awarded as much as $1.2 billion to the university and Eolas Technologies Inc., based in Chicago. "We are very satisfied," said Eolas attorney Martin R. Lueck. "It shows the jury system works. Patents need to be respected regardless of the size and the market power of the company involved." Eolas was launched in 1994 to market technology that allows users to access interactive programs embedded in Web pages. Eolas chairman Michael Doyle along with two others developed the technology while at the University of California at San Francisco. Eolas owns the exclusive rights to market the technology, while the university owns the patent. Eolas and the university say Microsoft made their technology part of Internet Explorer and bundled it with Windows. Microsoft attorneys argued that the patent was invalid and said that in any case their client had never infringed on it. Microsoft said the patent described features the technology didn't deliver. Eolas says the patent Microsoft was found to have infringed upon is the first browser system that allowed for the embedding of small interactive programs such as "plug-ins" or "applets," into World Wide Web documents. Such programs are central today to online commerce as they power everything from banner ads to interactive customer service. The award of $520.6 million was based on the jury's calculation that $1.47 per unit represented reasonable royalties for the more than 354 million copies of Windows sold from the time the patent was granted in November 1998 until September 2001. Eolas and the university had been asking for $3.50 for each unit. The average price of Windows during the period was $61, attorneys said. Attorneys said Eolas would receive the lion's share of any damages that are eventually paid, but declined to provide the specifics. Microsoft faces more than 30 patent-infringement lawsuits, covering digital rights management, online video game software and other technologies. Microsoft shares rose 3 cents to close at $25.61 in trading Monday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright 2003 AP
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- here we go again with software patents -- Jury orders Microsoft to pay more than $520 million Dave Farber (Aug 11)