is it valid -- SBC threatening to enforce 'frame' patent

[Dave Farber <dave () farber net>]

------ Forwarded Message
From: Bill Daul <bdaul () pacbell net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:40:18 -0800
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] SBC threatening to enforce 'frame' patent

LOOK at all the typos in this.  I don't believe it is valid.

--bill

At 04:54 PM 1/20/2003 +0900, you wrote:

> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Jeff Wasilko <jeffw () smoe org>
> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 21:35:00 -0500
> To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
> Subject: SBC threatening to enforce 'frame' patent
>
> Dave:
>
> Thought you might like to see this:
>
> http://www.museumtour.com/sbclawsuit.html
>
> ****
>
> SBC Communications claims they own Patent on Internal links and
> Includes, threatens to sue the little guys first, then move to
> the big guys.
>
> We received a 40 page package from SBC Intellectual Property
> today informing us that our web site  which has links on the left
> side that go to other web pages within the site  but does not
> lose the left side navigation links  was in violation of their
> Structured Document Browser Patent.
>
>
> ****
>
> -j
>
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>
> -------------------------------------
> You are subscribed as bdaul () pacbell net
> To unsubscribe or update your address, click
>   http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
>
> Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


--
Bill Daul

bdaul () pacbell net
Business Relationship Strategist
http://www.human-landscaping.com

"Play With Boundaries, Not Within."


------ End of Forwarded Message

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To unsubscribe or update your address, click
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/