Interesting People mailing list archives
Bruce Newman: 'Matrix' taps into deepest tech fears
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:25:19 -0400
Bruce Newman: 'Matrix' taps into deepest tech fears By Bruce Newman Mercury News In ``The Matrix Reloaded,'' God finally gets his close-up. We know it's God because he's wearing a white suit, has snowy white hair and is sufficiently omniscient to watch about a hundred TV monitors at once. Also, of course, because he declares that he is the supreme being of the computer simulation in which humans think they've been living. ``I am the Architect,'' He says. ``I created the Matrix.'' That's right. It turns out God is a computer programmer. ``Reloaded'' is the second installment of the futuristic sci-fi thrilogy, opening Thursday, and like ``The Matrix,'' it occasionally interrupts its action scenes long enough to inquire whether technology has become god of the modern world. The sequel seems to be warning that your computer is not your friend. In fact, it may be trying to enslave you. For anyone willing to look deeper than the films' glossy exterior, the ``Matrix'' mythology hacks into our heads with a warning to resist technology's chilly embrace. This is a neat philosophical backflip, because ``Reloaded'' uses powerful computer-generated effects to provide a technological thrill ride that you'd have to be a Luddite not to love. The movies tap into our darkest suspicions about technology, while advancing the technology of illusion in a way that forever alters the way filmmakers will be able to virtualize reality. The trilogy's geek gods, directors and brothers Andy and Larry Wachowski, have imagined the Matrix as a neural network of computers that works alarmingly like the Internet. The machines have harnessed humans as an energy source to keep them running -- just as the Internet thrives on a global web of users -- and the Matrix is an integrated delusion, an operating system in which life is just software. In effect, the movies themselves have become a matrix, a grid of candy-coated images that becomes stickier and stickier, until we're trapped. Technology's seductive qualities are made real in ``Reloaded'' by a new character named Persephone (Monica Bellucci), who lures Neo, the film's reluctant messiah, into a kiss that nearly sets off a catfight with Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss). ``She's like a vampire of emotions,'' Bellucci says of the temptress she plays. In real life, technology has become so seductive that it's not uncommon for people to spend more time with their computer than their family; to engage virtual strangers in chat rooms instead of getting out of the house. Almost nobody thinks this is a good idea, but almost nobody can stop doing it. ``We've set something in motion that gives us the feeling that we can no longer control the outcome,'' says Philip Clayton, professor of philosophy at Claremont Graduate University. ``We're at a state in the development of the technology where the lines between `real' and `virtual' are no longer so clear. And the overlapping technologies are so complex that no one person has the overview.'' Not even the technological wizards who created ``The Matrix'' had that kind of second sight. ``We were just making movies, endeavoring to entertain ourselves,'' says John Gaeta, the films' visual-effects supervisor, ``when we accidentally happened upon the technology that the story seems to be about.'' That may sound slightly less ominous than Robert Oppenheimer's quotation from the Bhagavad-gita -- ``I am become death: the destroyer of worlds'' -- after the detonation of the first atomic bomb in 1945. (The test was code-named ``Trinity,'' by the way, the name of one of the movies' most aggressive characters.) But like Oppenheimer, Gaeta says the filmmakers ``wouldn't have stopped because we were afraid of the potential for bad. We just want to get to the cool and the good.'' The cool and the good were mostly absent from the science fiction of the late 20th century, when the future was most often seen as dystopian. ``The Truman Show'' explored the idea of life as a smiley-faced virtual reality in 1998, but the Wachowskis have created a more complex cauldron of ideas, in which action is often secondary to philosophical musings. There is even a growing shelf of books with titles such as ``Taking the Red Pill: Science, Philosophy & Religion in `The Matrix,' '' in which the questions raised by the movies are as important as the answers. ``These sort of fictions are telling us something,'' says Erik Davis, author of ``Techgnosis,'' a book about technology and spirituality. ``They are encouraging us to look through the cracks, to see where the official story breaks down.'' One of the paradoxes set up by ``The Matrix'' mythology is that the movies can be enjoyed -- and dismissed -- as elegant science fiction by millions of people who believe devoutly in a God whose existence they cannot conclusively prove. Whether he will turn out to be the architect of an operating system, and whether the real world proves a better place for Neo -- for any of us -- remains to be seen. In ``The Matrix Reloaded,'' a band of human rebels is preparing to attack the machines -- an assault that will take place when ``The Matrix Revolutions'' is released Nov. 5 -- from their base in the subterranean city of Zion. There has been considerable speculation about what Zion would look like. The one glimpse we got during the first movie of life without the overlay of the Matrix made reality look like hell on earth. ``The world they inhabit is really nasty, whereas the Matrix is pretty tasty,'' says Davis. ``Waking up and starting to question the virtual realities that we're handed is not very pleasant, and in a lot of ways, that's where we're at. ``People are living inside their little bubbles, desperately holding onto their beliefs about how their world is constructed, about America's virtual-reality dream of itself.'' ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Bruce Newman: 'Matrix' taps into deepest tech fears Dave Farber (May 12)