more on new threat to our security: mail without complete addresses

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei () rsasecurity com>
Date: October 20, 2004 4:10:53 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Subject: RE: [IP] more on new threat to our security: mail without 
complete addresses

For IP, if you wish...
pt

> > From: Steve Bellovin <smb () research att com>

> > According to the Associated Press, physical mail from the U.S. to
> > Canada will be rejected unless the complete name and address of the
> > sender are included.  The reason: a "response to increased
> security".
> > http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-mail-to-
> > canada,0,3031142.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

> From: Bob Drzyzgula <bob () drzyzgula org>
>
> And they verify the sender's name and address ... how?
[...]
 Or am I missing something?
> --Bob Drzyzgula

[top-posting is Evil]

What you're missing is The Secure Snail Mail Act
of 2005, which makes it a Federal felony to send
mail with a false or missing return address.

Anonymous speech and privacy are desired only
by terrorists. Didn't you get the memo?

Peter Trei

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/