Interesting People mailing list archives
Google, journalism and being evil ...
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 09:40:38 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Richard Wiggins <richard.wiggins () gmail com> Date: August 5, 2005 11:13:31 PM EDT To: David Farber <dave () farber net> Cc: i-p () umich edu Subject: Re: [IP] Google, journalism and being evil ... Dave, Oh good grief, this conspiracy speculation is just plain silly.-- The hits at the top of the Google hit list are from prominent sites that have a high PageRank: News.com, ZDnet, ABC News, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, etc.
-- MSN doesn't have PageRank. (That's why Google is winning.) The very first hit on MSN for the same allegedly suspect search is:
BayouBuzz.com - Louisiana Politics and NewsThis story has nothing to do with Lousiana Politics and News. Sometimes search ranking algorithms do odd things.
-- The repeated use of the word "charade" is from headlines used in stories from CNet and from the AP. It should be no surprise that news outlets lead with the most eye-catching claim of the combants. And if Google puts the headlines from prominent news outlets at the top of the list, you see the same words throughout the hit list. -- Anyone who has watched Google News carefully since its inception understands that the same wire story is poorly de-duped across multiple news outlets. This story is now old enough that the regular Google Web search has picked it up. PageRank takes it from there, delivering duplicated stories from the media outlets with the highest PageRank. -- For several reasons, "Dr. Lee court documents Google Microsoft" is not likely to yield the results the reporter sought. It is frankly a rather naive search for this breaking news. If the reporter seeks court documents, he should contact the court.
It is quite a remarkable thing for someone to assume that if a search engine doesn't yield the documents he expected based on the keywords he randomly chose, then therefore the engineers are engaged in a conspiracy theory.
/rich Google: Microsoft Lawsuit Is a 'Charade'Google Says That the Microsoft Lawsuit Is a 'Charade' Aimed at Scaring People By ELIZABETH M. GILLESPIE Associated Press Writer
On 8/5/05, David Farber <dave () farber net> wrote: Begin forwarded message: From: Lars Poulsen <lars () beagle-ears com > Date: August 5, 2005 8:19:09 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Google, journalism and being evil ... Dave, for IP if you wish. Yesterday, my business partner alerted me to this story on webpronews (among his several hats, he does search engine optimization for our company's website). This echoes in interesting ways with the recent stories about Google taking revenge on journalists that embarrass Google. I found the same pattern described in the article when I searched on Google and MSN for "Google Microsoft Dr Lee lawsuit", so the effect is fairly robust. / Lars Poulsen ----------------------------------------- http://www.webpronews.com/insidesearch/insidesearch/ wpn-56-20050804MSNGooglesDrLeeLawsuitSERPsVastlyDifferent.html MSN, Google's Dr. Lee Lawsuit SERPs Vastly Different Jason Lee Miller | Staff Writer | 2005-08-04 As everybody in the Google and Microsoft camps has been Kai-Fu fighting, the logical thing to relay to you this morning was the report that Google anticipated a lawsuit and was prepared to pay Dr. Lee, lawsuit or not, work or not, for up to a year. But as I was searching for these court documents, I came across something very interesting. MSN and Google are delivering search results about the case with opposing messages. Hmmmmm. If you've read the Dogpile report that search results across the major search engines only had a 1.1% overlap, then it is not surprising that results may vary. But this variation is somewhat suspect when you consider the players involved. When the search terms "Dr. Lee court documents Google Microsoft" were entered into Google, the majority of results were emblazoned with the phrase "lawsuit is a charade" in large comforting letters, repeated again again again. That's interesting, I thought. I wonder what MSN returns? As I suspected, there was one link, in the middle, with the "charade" reference. The rest were to the tune of "Microsoft wins round against Google," and "Ex-Microsoft Exec Barred From Google Job."Could this be a coincidence? Or is this brilliant PR algorithmic manipulation?
Next, I did what any fair researcher would do, I check Yahoo! for a control group. Yahoo! seemed fairly balanced on the matter and delivered the most current listings-including #3 result for WebProWorld discussion, thank you. Here are the screen caps, submitted for your perusal. And just for efficiency, here's your link to WebProWorld for discussion. ... ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as galler () umich edu To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Google, journalism and being evil ... David Farber (Aug 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Google, journalism and being evil ... David Farber (Aug 06)