Interesting People mailing list archives
What If Copyright Law Were Strongly Enforced in the Blogosphere?
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:32:05 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com> Date: December 19, 2005 7:12:30 PM EST To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net () warpspeed com>Subject: [Dewayne-Net] re: What If Copyright Law Were Strongly Enforced in the Blogosphere?
Reply-To: dewayne () warpspeed com [Note: This comment comes from reader Thomas Leavitt. DLH]
From: Thomas Leavitt <thomas () thomasleavitt org> Date: December 19, 2005 3:40:18 PM PST To: dewayne () warpspeed comSubject: Re: [Dewayne-Net] re: What If Copyright Law Were Strongly Enforced in the Blogosphere?Dewayne,This constant reference to content as property ignores the very real anddistinctive difference, both legally and traditionally, between "real" property, and "intellectual property".Copyright law exists for the greater social good. Just like patents, it is time limited (or at least it used to be), as a result of a collective decision that a greater social good is served by having material revertto the public domain or patents expire. Copyright, until recently, was not a "patrimony", it was intended to provide a reasonable incentive to create work, and receive reasonablerecompense... given that most creative works have near zero value to the creator after a reasonable period (it used to be 20 years), but may wellretain value subsequent to that for the society as a whole. Copyrightlaw was never intended to grant ownership in perpetuity to the creator.Thomas
Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com> ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- What If Copyright Law Were Strongly Enforced in the Blogosphere? David Farber (Dec 21)