Interesting People mailing list archives
eminent domain
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:41:31 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Brad Templeton <btm () templetons com> Date: June 24, 2005 7:04:01 PM EDT To: David Farber <dave () farber net> Cc: provost () georgtown edu Subject: Re: [IP] eminent domain On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 06:28:42PM -0400, David Farber wrote:
Dave, Thinking about this case it may help to look at some context.
We, nor the supreme court, I fear, should be looking at the context.The supreme court should really only be considering the general principle.
Are there properties where it would be better for the city if they were expropriated and redeveloped by private landowners? Surely there are. The question was whether the constituion allows this. I and 4/5ths of the court think not, 5/4ths think so. This having been ruled, a more interesting question is perhaps how to make it more fair. Normally, when a developer seeks to buy up and amalgamate many properties, she has to offer a premium over their "market price" unless she can do it in secret. Expropriation tends to be at an estimated market price. If a developer is interested, it means the developer (and also the city, if they will expropriate) sees more value in the land, once condemned and amalgamated, than ordinary home-buyers in the house market would. I submit that this value should be given, mostly or wholly, to the homeowners. Let the developer reap appreciation after they develop, not through expropriation and amalgamation. Let hte city reap value through the new economic structure they hope for. In my most recent blog entry at: http://ideas.4brad.com/node/231 I go into some thoughts as to how to do this.One simple method is as follows. After the condemnation and amalgamation,
the developer must set a price for the new market value of the combined property. They must pay the homeowners any difference above what they were paid as "market value" when the land was taken. (Pro rated by that market value.)Once they set a price, any other developer may bid at or above that price
for the parcel, to develop a similar project. The highest bid wins, and again, any difference is passed to the expropriation victims. ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- eminent domain David Farber (Jun 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- eminent domain David Farber (Jun 26)
- eminent domain David Farber (Jun 27)