Interesting People mailing list archives
more on High-tech army defeats insurgency; May I citesome examples?
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 16:35:48 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "Munro, Neil" <NMunro () nationaljournal com> Date: October 4, 2005 4:04:53 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re. High-tech army defeats insurgency; May I citesome examples? Armies routinely defeat insurgencies. You just don't hear about those that don't exist any more. The media tends to forget what isn't news, avoid losers and wallow in Vietnam. The Brits defeated the Malayan communists, and the US & Philippines defeated the Huks, in the 1960s. The Brits defeated the IRA this month after 25 years and roughly 4,000 deaths. The Red Army Faction, Baader-Meinhof and the Red Brigades are gone. The US killed Che in Bolivia, then helped defeat the communists in El Salvador. The US helped destroy the insurgent Viet Cong in South Vietnam, but then cut off ammunition to the South Vietnamese Army when it was being attacked by the North Vietnamese Army's tank divisions in 1975. The US defeated the Philippines rebels in the early 1900s, and sundry Indian tribes in the 1800s. In bloodier wars, the Chinese army defeated the large Tibetan insurgency in the 1960s, after which the Tibetans emphasized the role of non-violence. The Germans defeated the Namibians, the Brits defeated insurgencies many times around the empire including several in Ireland - and the Russians subjugated numerous groups in their vast empire. For useful - albeit limited - updates on the military situation in the Iraq campaign, visit billroggio.com and http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/ Neil PS Pentagon types have long sought ways to measure progress in an Iraq-type campaign. There are many ways to do it, including opinion polls, the volume of tips, the number of enemy deserters, the going-rate for contract-attacks, even the cost of renting a taxi from Baghdad airport to town. Soldiers know that war is chiefly a matter of the heart, and that efforts to identify markers are easily jeered at by people who prefer to count material-factors, such as corpses. -----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 3:04 PM To: Ip Ip Subject: [IP] USG RFI for "metrics" on the 'terror war' Begin forwarded message: From: Richard Forno <rforno () infowarrior org> Date: October 4, 2005 2:45:23 PM EDT To: Infowarrior List <infowarrior () g2-forward org> Cc: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: USG RFI for "metrics" on the 'terror war' While I'm all for knowing how to measure one's effectiveness, I fear that such "metrics" will be nothing more than a rehash of Vietnam-era body count tallies as the "measure of success" in the 'war' to make juicy and positive-sounding quotes for the current iteration of the Five O'Clock Follies. This, coupled with the continuing belief that a conventional high- tech army can defeat a low-tech insurgency (something that has not happened in Western history to my knowledge) only reinforces my sense that the USG is not learning from history but rather repeating it. The fact that a contractor is being asked to develop these "metrics" speaks volumes, IMHO. You'd think this would be something they'd have come up with BEFORE launching into the 'war' on terror, right? -rick <snip>
The Contractor shall develop, in conjunction with the Joint Staff, OSD, Combatant and Unified Commands, Services and designated Agencies (stakeholders) a system of metrics to accurately assess US progress in the War on Terrorism, identify critical issues hindering progress and develop and track action plans to resolve the issues identified. In this effort, the contractor shall work as an independent contractor not subject to the supervision and control of the Government. All deliverables become the property of the US Government.
Source document: http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/files/ WarOnTerrorismMetrics.doc ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as nmunro () nationaljournal com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on High-tech army defeats insurgency; May I citesome examples? David Farber (Oct 04)