Interesting People mailing list archives
more on something to dream about -- nightmare more on Oil Independence?
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:53:19 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Hugh Crawford <hugh-list () thoughtballoon com> Date: September 13, 2005 1:31:18 PM EDT To: dave () farber netSubject: Re: [IP] something to dream about -- nightmare more on Oil Independence?
Which begs the question, why not just use the "new technology nukes [that] are plenty safe" ( pebble bed helium cooled nukes?) for power in the first place and skip the oil part?
Hugh David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message: From: MLowe_turbinetool <mlowe () turbinetool com> Date: September 13, 2005 11:45:18 AM EDT To: 'David Farber' <dave () farber net>, 'Ip Ip' <ip () v2 listbox com> Subject: RE: more on Oil Independence?You won't get any CO2 if you use nukes for the power source for the heaters. The new technology nukes are plenty safe and will eventually get used here, with or without the consent of the hysterical, because it is the right way.
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on something to dream about -- nightmare more on Oil Independence? David Farber (Sep 13)