Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Question for IP
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:01:48 +0900
Begin forwarded message: From: Chris Beck <cbeck () pacanukeha net> Date: September 21, 2006 12:20:57 AM JSTTo: hugh crawford <hugh () hughcrawford com>, Steven Davidson <SDavidson () maimonidesmed org>, Dave Farber <dave () farber net>, Paul Killey <paul () umich edu>, Maris <mfogels () redplanet ca>
Subject: Re: [IP] Question for IP Greetings!Thank you so much for your helpful replies, I will definitely follow up on them. Joe Crawford from the list reminded me of what I was looking for - something
called the "Overton Window": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window http://www.mackinac.org/article.aspx?ID=7504 "In addition to being dependent on the ideas that form the boundaries of the political climate, politicians are also known to be self-interested and desirous of obtaining the best political result for themselves.[2] Therefore, they will almost always constrain themselves to taking actions within the "window" of ideas approved of by the electorate. Actions outside of this window, while theoretically possible, and maybe more optimal in terms of sound policy, are politically unsuccessful. Even if a few legislators were willing to stick out their necks for an action outside the window, most would not risk the disfavor of their constituents. They may seek the good of those who elected them, and even the good of the state or nation as a whole, but in pursuing the course they think is best, most will certainly take into account their political future. This is the heart of the Overton window theory. "So, if a think tank's research and the principles of sound policy suggest a particular idea that lies outside the Overton window, what is to be done? Shift the window. Since commonly held ideas, attitudes and presumptions frame what is politically possible and create the "window," a change in the opinions held by politicians and the people in general will shift it. Move the window of what is politically possible and those policies previously impractical can become the next great popular and legislative rage." +++++++++++ Again, thank you for your kind and prompt responses. Cheers, Chris -- Christopher Beck - http://pacanukeha.wordpress.com Implicit in the term ‘national defense’ is the notion of defending those values and ideas which set this Nation apart. . . . It would indeed be ironic if, in the name of national defense, we would sanction the subversion of . . . those liberties . . . which makes the defense of the Nation worthwhile. -- Justice Warren in U.S. v. Robel ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Question for IP David Farber (Sep 20)