Interesting People mailing list archives

New Arizona case involving anonymous Internet speech


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:16:46 +0200



Begin forwarded message:

From: Paul Levy <plevy () citizen org>
Date: September 27, 2006 8:37:43 PM GMT+02:00
To: dave () farber net
Subject: New Arizona case involving anonymous Internet speech

We have just filed a friend of the court brief (joined by EFF) in an appellate case in Arizona which appears to be the first time the right of anonymous Internet speech, and the problem of how to decide whether to compel the identification of an anonymous Internet user accused of wrongdoing, will be presented in that state's courts.

The case involves some pretty unusual facts: the Doe defendant is an anonymous Internet speaker who obtained an email that the married head of Mobilisa, a software company, had sent from work to his mistress, and distributed the email to other executives with the comment that the email reflected poorly on the company. Instead of the executive himself suing for invasion of privacy, the executive had the company sue alleging that the email must have been obtained by hacking into the company's computer system. The company obtained a subpoena to the emailer's Internet Service Provider from Arizona Superior Court, and after receiving sworn denials from the executive and his mistress that they had given the email to anyone else or authorized access to their personal email accounts, the trial judge ordered the disclosure of the anonymous emailer's identity. Both the Doe and the Internet Service Provider appealed.

We argue that, whatever the outcome of the appeal with respect to the identity at issue, Arizona should follow other states by requiring evidence of the wrongdoing that is alleged, and by balancing the interest in obtaining redress for serious wrongs against the right to remain anonymous unless and until there is good evidence of wrongdoing.

Paul Alan Levy
Public Citizen Litigation Group
1600 - 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 588-1000
http://www.citizen.org/litigation

Robert Yule 9/27/2006 2:21 PM >>>
PUBLIC CITIZEN PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Release:            Contact: Paul Alan Levy (202) 588-1000
Sept. 27, 2006 Robert Yule (202) 588-7703

Software Company's Attempts to Reveal Identity of Anonymous
E-mailer May Stifle Internet Free Speech

Public Citizen Files Brief to Support Right of Internet Speakers Who Have Done No Harm to Remain Nameless

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A Washington state software company may not have the right to reveal the identity of an anonymous e-mailer, according to a friend of the court brief filed today in an Arizona court of appeals by Public Citizen, joined by the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

The company Mobilisa sought to discover the identity of an anonymous e-mailer who distributed to other executives at the company the text of an e-mail originally sent by Mobilisa's married CEO to his mistress. The unknown sender used the services of the Arizona-based Internet service provider Suggestion Box, which enables members of the public to send e-mails anonymously.

Instead of suing for invasion of privacy, the executive had the company file suit against "John Does 1-10" in Washington state court alleging that the e-mail must have been obtained by hacking into the company's computer system - a violation of federal law. The company then filed a motion in Arizona Superior Court in Phoenix against Suggestion Box to gain access to the identity of the e-mailer, giving sworn denials from the CEO and his mistress that they had given the e- mail to anyone else or authorized access to their personal e-mail accounts. Suggestion Box appealed when the trial judge granted Mobilisa the right to discover the sender's name, even though the court did not find facts showing that the e-mail was illegally obtained from Mobilisa's own systems.

In the brief, Public Citizen and EFF urged the court to balance the interests of plaintiffs who feel they have been subject to wrongful speech against the important right of Internet speakers who have done no wrong to maintain their anonymity, while considering whether the online speakers abused their anonymity to engage in wrongful conduct online, such as by posting truly defaming or libelous comments. The organizations argued for an equitable balancing standard for consideration of such cases and asked the court to determine whether Mobilisa had made a technically adequate showing of facts to make its case, but did not take a position on whether this disclosure order should stand.

"The fundamental rights of free speech do not stop at the Internet portal," said Paul Alan Levy, the Public Citizen attorney who authored the brief. "The ability to speak or criticize anonymously online is an important tool for whistleblowers to expose misconduct or corruption by powerful companies or public figures. Courts should strike the right balance to protect online anonymity when it has not been abused and prevent the threat of lawsuits from having a chilling effect on this important type of speech."

John Flynn, of the Phoenix law firm of Tiffany & Bosco, was local counsel on the brief.
        
To read the brief, visit http://www.citizen.org/documents/ mobilisa_amicus.pdf.

Public Citizen has a strong record of defending the First Amendment rights of Internet users. To learn more, visit http://www.citizen.org/ litigation/briefs/IntFreeSpch/index.cfm.

###

Public Citizen (www.citizen.org) is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (www.eff.org) is a San Francisco-based nonprofit organization that protects civil liberties related to technology and the Internet.





-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: