Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: WORTH READING -- Study Gives High Marks to U.S. Internet - New York Times
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:44:46 -0700
________________________________________ From: David P. Reed [dpreed () reed com] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:28 PM To: David Farber Cc: ip Subject: Re: [IP] Re: WORTH READING -- Study Gives High Marks to U.S. Internet - New York Times I've already had the NYT article on the report quoted back to me by senior policymakers on the Hill as an argument that the need for improved high speed Internet deployment the US is just not important. While I don't want to compare my friend John Markoff with Judy Miller, I think the paper of record should be careful not to become a shill for PR from Davos or any other propaganda machine. It's too late for deeper analysis. The NYT has spoken, and everything is fine. D ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Re: WORTH READING -- Study Gives High Marks to U.S. Internet - New York Times David Farber (Apr 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: WORTH READING -- Study Gives High Marks to U.S. Internet - New York Times David Farber (Apr 09)
- Re: WORTH READING -- Study Gives High Marks to U.S. Internet - New York Times David Farber (Apr 10)
- Re: WORTH READING -- Study Gives High Marks to U.S. Internet - New York Times David Farber (Apr 17)
- Re: WORTH READING -- Study Gives High Marks to U.S. Internet - New York Times David Farber (Apr 17)