Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Comcast Response
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:50:37 -0800
________________________________________ From: David Allen [David_Allen_AB63 () post harvard edu] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 12:44 PM To: David Farber Subject: RE: [IP] Comcast Response Nor did I. Went down myself about the same time frame, fortunately able to poke around and finally figure out 587 as a workaround. Outrageous, beyond saying, that Comcast is claiming they cut off just spammers. You are on a Mac, surely; so am I. I just know that neither of our machines have been backdoored into a botnet. In my case, I suspect that my not using the Comcast SMTP put me on a radar screen. Or they just blanket cut off 25. But of course they lie otherwise. Lying SOBs. At 6:52 AM -0800 1/20/08, David Farber wrote:
no I did not ________________________________________ From: David Allen [David_Allen_AB63 () post harvard edu] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:41 AM To: David Farber Subject: Re: [IP] Comcast Response Aren't you glad to find out that you are a spammer, Dave? You did get that helpful notice about port 587 from Comcast, didn't you? David Allen At 6:22 AM -0800 1/20/08, David Farber wrote:________________________________________ From: Forde, Declan [Declan_Forde () cable comcast com] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:29 PM To: David Farber Subject: Comcast Response Dave, We have seen the flurry of posts about Comcast and e-mail blocking and customer communications. I would like to take this opportunity to provide Comcast's position on these comments. As part our ongoing efforts to reduce spam, Comcast blocks Port 25 on those computers that have been identified as a spam relay and are being exploited by spammers to send large volumes of unwanted email. The comments in the thread suggest that we do not communicate with customers when we block Port 25. In fact, we send an email to the impacted customer to let them know what has happened and provide instructions on how to easily switch to the more secure Port 587. In many cases, our customers are appreciative of this proactive approach to securing their computer. It is also suggested that we do not provide any information on Comcast.net to assist customers with this issue. Please take a look at the following FAQ which answers anticipated customer questions and provides a One Click Fix for our customers to easily switch to Port 587: http://www.comcast.net/help/faq/index.jsp?faq=Email118989#25 Blocking of Port 25 is a common practice among ISP's and it is endorsed by the FTC as an effective means to reduce spam generated by zombies. Please see: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/spam/zombie/index.htm We are targeting only known infected computers and do not block Port 25 for all customers. Blocking of port 25 is not new for Comcast. We have been using this targeted approach for about 4 years and it continues to help reduce spam while also minimizing the impact on our customers. I hope these comments are helpful. Declan Declan Forde Snr. Director of Security Comcast This message and any attachments to it contain information exclusively for intended recipients. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender to report the error and then delete all copies of this message from your system. ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Comcast Response David Farber (Jan 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comcast Response David Farber (Jan 20)
- Re: Comcast Response David Farber (Jan 20)
- Re: Comcast Response David Farber (Jan 20)
- Re: Comcast Response David Farber (Jan 21)