Interesting People mailing list archives

50 Percent of Sequoia Voting Machines Flawed


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:23:53 -0700


________________________________________
From: lynn [lynn () ecgincc com]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 2:48 PM
To: David Farber
Subject: NY: 50 Percent of Sequoia Voting Machines Flawed

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/ny-50-percent-o.html

NY: 50 Percent of Sequoia Voting Machines Flawed

New York state is in the process of replacing its lever voting machines
with new voting equipment, but the state revealed recently that it has
found problems with 50 percent of the roughly 1,500 ImageCast optical-scan
machines (shown in the video above) that Sequoia Voting Systems has
delivered to the state so far -- machines that are slated to be used by
dozens of counties in the state's September 9 primary and November 4
presidential election.

Douglas Kellner, co-chair of the New York State Board of Elections,
expressed frustration with the vendor, saying it appeared that Sequoia was
using the state's acceptance testing process to find problems with its
machines in lieu of a sound quality-control process.

"There's no way the vendor could be adequately reviewing the machines and
having so many problems," he told Threat Level. "What it tells us is that
the vendor just throws this stuff over the transom and does not do any
alpha- or beta-testing of their own before they apply for certification
testing. Then they expect that we'll identify technical glitches and then
they'll correct those glitches. But correction of those glitches is an
extraordinarily time-consuming process. And its very disappointing that
this equipment is not ready for prime time."

One main problem with the machines has been the printers. The ImageCast
machines are special optical-scan machines that include an LCD screen, a
printer and a ballot-marking device that allows disabled voters to use
them. Disabled voters view the ballot on screen or hear it read to them
through headphones, then make their selection using special attachments (a
device with buttons or a sipping straw), after which the machine prints
out a paper ballot that gets read by the optical scanner component.

The printer, Kellner noted, is a core component of the machine. But they
malfunction "if you don't feed the paper exactly right or if the buttons
aren't pushed just right," he said. They also have trouble handling
write-in candidates. If a voter's writing exceeds a certain width, Kellner
said the printer shuts down without indicating why it's shutting down.

"These are serious glitches that should have been picked up in the
vendor's own quality-control process," he said.

snip




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: