Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. [with comments]
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:38:53 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Andrew C Burnette <acb () acb net> Date: July 1, 2009 9:01:28 PM EDT To: Bob Frankston <Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com> Cc: dave () farber netSubject: Re: [IP] Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. [with comments]
Bob, et al, I think we agree on all points involved. I simply note the similarities in the problems with the 800 phone directory (e.g. free "call my company" names/numbers) and DNS. there's a sequence of TLD's (800, 888, 877, .com, .net, et al) that are not helpful to the end user. If I as a user want to shop at target, why should the .com matter at all? (rhetorical at the minimum). As a user, should I not be able to type in "target" (pick any brand name) and have a reasonable chance of getting to the right place safely? I allude to the similarities in the built in distrust or lack of acceptance in self signed SSL/TLS certificates. I run into the same issue on my "friends and family" mail service (three dozen domains or so) when setting up clients with self signed certs. Whom do you trust, and how do I share that trust effectively? Both are similar issues faced in the DNS schema as it exists now, and both in need of a broader, distributed, but trust based solution. (do you seriously trust that NSI, a former defense contractor (SAIC) has your interests in front? I know you don't but it's not obvious to the common internet user in anyone's imagination). I suppose my unstated point is the fact that we fail in a larger sense to learn from prior mistakes. Suggestions welcomed ;-) Cheers, Andy Burnette Bob Frankston wrote:
Phone directories were instruments of social policy - you had to pay to not be listed. It increased traffic. Today we have reached critical massand the emphasis has shifted to controlling our availability. The only people who want “phone books” are direct marketing companies. (That’s also why caller-ID names are faked – the real CLID names are sold to marketing companies). -----Original Message----- From: Andrew C Burnette [mailto:acb () acb net] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 11:03 To: dave () farber net Cc: Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com Subject: Re: [IP] Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. [with comments] Same land grab took place when 888, 877 and so on were added to 800 numbers. the increase in available real estate was far less than expected of course. fundamentally flawed structure as Bob well points out. but is it dissimilar to the [antiquated] telephone directories ofyesterday? in practice, most folks have replaced those with a p2p[erson]style of phone number exchanges among family and friends.(I can find people via any number of social networking sites faster thanI can get their phone numbers, as it should be the same with self signedsecurity certs) regards, andy David Farber wrote:Begin forwarded message:*From: *"Bob Frankston" <Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com<mailto:Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com>>*Date: *June 30, 2009 10:59:08 AM EDT*To: *<dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>>*Cc: *"James Seng " <james () seng sg <mailto:james () seng sg>>, "'LaurenWeinstein'" <lauren () vortex com <mailto:lauren () vortex com>>*Subject: **RE: [IP] Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief asNew C.E.O. [with comments]*Whatever the original mission of ICANN was we've learned a lot sincethen we need to do more than spawn lots of little NSIs – that's notcompetition, it's just a feeding frenzy. ICANN isn't addressing thefundamental dysfunction and failures of the DNS:· The DNS cannot be a directory but adding support for morelanguages only reinforces that misconception.· We still don't stable identifiers – the new gTLDs justcontinue the tradition of creating billable events.A fundamental principle of the Internet is that those outside thenetwork create their own solutions. Yet the DNS has turned out to havebeen a failure – it keeps control firmly inside the network and it'svery existence frustrates efforts to move on. ICANN should be doing allit can to deprecate the DNS. As an interim the DNS should immediatelyand without any further ado provide for stable handles that don't havesemantic baggage and thus have no need to be reused. It should thenencourage others like WIPO and private companies like Google, Skype,Microsoft etc to provide their own directory and registry servicesUltimately we mustn't have to a fatal dependency on a single centralpoint of failure and control like the DNS. In the meantime we should bedoing what we can to reduce that dependency. It should also tackle thefailed idea of the IP address that has made routing unnecessarilycomplicated and assured identifiers are not stable thus leading to thekludge called the DNS.To put it another way – ICANN is a finger in the dike. We shouldn'ttreat it as a solution but rather a reminder that dike is in desperateneed of repair. Can an outsider provide the kind of stronger leadershipnecessary to move ICANN beyond its original mission so it can do whathas to be done to assure the continued vibrancy of the dynamic we call"The Internet"?-----Original Message-----From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net]Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 09:14To: ipSubject: [IP] Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O.[with comments]Begin forwarded message:From: James Seng <james () seng sg <mailto:james () seng sg>>Date: June 29, 2009 9:42:42 PM EDTTo: dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com <mailto:ip () v2 listbox com>>Subject: Re: [IP] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O.[with comments]I have a lot of respect for Lauren for her [his djf] work on numerousissues onInternet. So I am surprised and concerned about the tone Lauren hastaken on ICANN.While there are certain room for improvement for ICANN in variousareas, the opening of new gTLD is an area that was a slated goal fromICANN from its early days of formation of introducing competition toback-then Network Solution and now Verisign.Competition and choice for consumer is good. One may argue what thebalance should be, it is another take a position that ICANN is 'onenotch short of scam' in trying to introducing competition to themarketplace.-James SengOn Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:12 AM, David Farber<dave () farber net<mailto:dave () farber net>> wrote:Begin forwarded message:From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com <mailto:lauren () vortex com>>Date: June 27, 2009 11:09:15 AM EDTTo: nnsquad () nnsquad org <mailto:nnsquad () nnsquad org>Subject: [ NNSquad ] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as NewC.E.O.[with comments]This decision had been rumored for weeks. Three comments:1) The more TLDs that are introduced, the more confusion there isamong both domain name holders and the Internet user community ingeneral (that is, the population of the world). As such, the mainTLDs already in common use (com, net, org, edu + country TLDs)gain in value and demand since they will increasingly stand outamongst the clutter of MOBIes, SEXies, WIMPies, WACKies, and whoknows what else, most of which will quite rightly be treated byconsumers as confusing nonsense. The driving force behind theintroduction of new TLDs at this stage is creating new profitcenters through consumer confusion, and ICANN has become theprimary enabler of a domain name regime that we can charitablycategorize as just one notch short of a scam.2) ICANN is increasingly a white elephant whose originaljustifications have been warped in ways that Kafka might haveappreciated, but that no longer tend to serve the interests of theInternet community at large. It is difficult to see how itcan have any long term future, especially given the internationalforces in play.3) To Rod Beckstrom: You thought things were screwed up at NCC?You ain't seen nuthin' yet. Lotsa luck ... you're gonna need it.--Lauren--NNSquad Moderator- - ------ Forwarded message from David Farber <dave () farber net<mailto:dave () farber net>> -----Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:30:32 -0400From: David Farber <dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>>Subject: [IP] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. -NYTimes.comReply-To: dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>To: ip <ip () v2 listbox com <mailto:ip () v2 listbox com>>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/06/26/technology/AP-US-TEC-Internet-Names.html?ref=technology-------------------------------------------Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=nowRSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com----- End forwarded message ------------------------------------------------Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=nowRSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com-------------------------------------------Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=nowRSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.comArchives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now><https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/> [Powered by Listbox]<http://www.listbox.com>
------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. [with comments] David Farber (Jul 02)