Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. [with comments]


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:38:53 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: Andrew C Burnette <acb () acb net>
Date: July 1, 2009 9:01:28 PM EDT
To: Bob Frankston <Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com>
Cc: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. [with comments]

Bob, et al,

I think we agree on all points involved.

I simply note the similarities in the problems with the 800 phone
directory (e.g. free "call my company" names/numbers) and DNS. there's a
sequence of TLD's (800, 888, 877, .com, .net, et al) that are not
helpful to the end user. If I as a user want to shop at target, why
should the .com matter at all? (rhetorical at the minimum). As a user,
should I not be able to type in "target" (pick any brand name) and have
a reasonable chance of getting to the right place safely?

I allude to the similarities in the built in distrust or lack of
acceptance in self signed SSL/TLS certificates. I run into the same
issue on my "friends and family" mail service (three dozen domains or
so) when setting up clients with self signed certs. Whom do you trust,
and how do I share that trust effectively?

Both are similar issues faced in the DNS schema as it exists now, and
both in need of a broader, distributed, but trust based solution. (do
you seriously trust that NSI, a former defense contractor (SAIC) has
your interests in front? I know you don't but it's not obvious to the
common internet user in anyone's imagination).

I suppose my unstated point is the fact that we fail in a larger sense
to learn from prior mistakes.

Suggestions welcomed ;-)

Cheers,
Andy Burnette

Bob Frankston wrote:
Phone directories were instruments of social policy - you had to pay to not be listed. It increased traffic. Today we have reached critical mass
and the emphasis has shifted to controlling our availability. The only
people who want “phone books” are direct marketing companies. (That’s
also why caller-ID names are faked – the real CLID names are sold to
marketing companies).



-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew C Burnette [mailto:acb () acb net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 11:03
To: dave () farber net
Cc: Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com
Subject: Re: [IP] Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New
C.E.O. [with comments]



Same land grab took place when 888, 877 and so on were added to 800

numbers. the increase in available real estate was far less than

expected of course.



fundamentally flawed structure as Bob well points out.



but is it dissimilar to the [antiquated] telephone directories of

yesterday? in practice, most folks have replaced those with a p2p[erson]

style of phone number exchanges among family and friends.



(I can find people via any number of social networking sites faster than

I can get their phone numbers, as it should be the same with self signed

security certs)



regards,

andy



David Farber wrote:





Begin forwarded message:



*From: *"Bob Frankston" <Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com

<mailto:Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com>>

*Date: *June 30, 2009 10:59:08 AM EDT

*To: *<dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>>

*Cc: *"James Seng " <james () seng sg <mailto:james () seng sg>>, "'Lauren

Weinstein'" <lauren () vortex com <mailto:lauren () vortex com>>

*Subject: **RE: [IP] Re:    Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as

New C.E.O. [with  comments]*



Whatever the original mission of ICANN was we've learned a lot since

then we need to do more than spawn lots of little NSIs – that's not

competition, it's just a feeding frenzy. ICANN isn't addressing the

fundamental dysfunction and failures of the DNS:

·         The DNS cannot be a directory but adding support for more

languages only reinforces that misconception.

·         We still don't stable identifiers – the new gTLDs just

continue the tradition of creating billable events.



A fundamental principle of the Internet is that those outside the

network create their own solutions. Yet the DNS has turned out to have

been a failure – it keeps control firmly inside the network and it's

very existence frustrates efforts to move on. ICANN should be doing all

it can to deprecate the DNS. As an interim the DNS should immediately

and without any further ado provide for stable handles that don't have

semantic baggage and thus have no need to be reused. It should then

encourage others like WIPO and private companies like Google, Skype,

Microsoft etc to provide their own directory and registry services



Ultimately we mustn't have to a fatal dependency on a single central

point of failure and control like the DNS. In the meantime we should be

doing what we can to reduce that dependency. It should also tackle the

failed idea of the IP address that has made routing unnecessarily

complicated and assured identifiers are not stable thus leading to the

kludge called the DNS.



To put it another way – ICANN is a finger in the dike. We shouldn't

treat it as a solution but rather a reminder that dike is in desperate

need of repair. Can an outsider provide the kind of stronger leadership

necessary to move ICANN beyond its original mission so it can do what

has to be done to assure the continued vibrancy of the dynamic we call

"The Internet"?



-----Original Message-----

From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net]

Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 09:14

To: ip

Subject: [IP] Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O.

[with comments]







Begin forwarded message:



From: James Seng <james () seng sg <mailto:james () seng sg>>

Date: June 29, 2009 9:42:42 PM EDT

To: dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>

Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com <mailto:ip () v2 listbox com>>

Subject: Re: [IP] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O.

[with  comments]



I have a lot of respect for Lauren for her [his djf] work on numerous

issues on

Internet. So I am surprised and concerned about the tone Lauren has

taken on ICANN.



While there are certain room for improvement for ICANN in various

areas, the opening of new gTLD is an area that was a slated goal from

ICANN from its early days of formation of introducing competition to

back-then Network Solution and now Verisign.



Competition and choice for consumer is good. One may argue what the

balance should be, it is another take a position that ICANN is 'one

notch short of scam' in trying to introducing competition to the

marketplace.



-James Seng



On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:12 AM, David Farber<dave () farber net

<mailto:dave () farber net>> wrote:





Begin forwarded message:



From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com <mailto:lauren () vortex com>>

Date: June 27, 2009 11:09:15 AM EDT

To: nnsquad () nnsquad org <mailto:nnsquad () nnsquad org>

Subject: [ NNSquad ] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New

C.E.O.

[with comments]





This decision had been rumored for weeks.  Three comments:



1) The more TLDs that are introduced, the more confusion there is

 among both domain name holders and the Internet user community in

 general (that is, the population of the world).  As such, the main

 TLDs already in common use (com, net, org, edu + country TLDs)

 gain in value and demand since they will increasingly stand out

 amongst the clutter of MOBIes, SEXies, WIMPies, WACKies, and who

 knows what else, most of which will quite rightly be treated by

 consumers as confusing nonsense.  The driving force behind the

 introduction of new TLDs at this stage is creating new profit

 centers through consumer confusion, and ICANN has become the

 primary enabler of a domain name regime that we can charitably

 categorize as just one notch short of a scam.



2) ICANN is increasingly a white elephant whose original

 justifications have been warped in ways that Kafka might have

 appreciated, but that no longer tend to serve the interests of the

 Internet community at large.  It is difficult to see how it

 can have any long term future, especially given the international

 forces in play.



3) To Rod Beckstrom: You thought things were screwed up at NCC?

 You ain't seen nuthin' yet.  Lotsa luck ... you're gonna need it.



--Lauren--

NNSquad Moderator



- - -



----- Forwarded message from David Farber <dave () farber net

<mailto:dave () farber net>> -----



Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:30:32 -0400

From: David Farber <dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>>

Subject: [IP] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. -

      NYTimes.com

Reply-To: dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>

To: ip <ip () v2 listbox com <mailto:ip () v2 listbox com>>






http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/06/26/technology/AP-US-TEC-Internet-Names.html?ref=technology









-------------------------------------------

Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now

RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/

Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



----- End forwarded message -----









-------------------------------------------

Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now

RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/

Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com











-------------------------------------------

Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now

RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/

Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now>

<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/> [Powered by Listbox]

<http://www.listbox.com>







-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: