Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. [with comments]


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:13:42 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: James Seng <james () seng sg>
Date: June 29, 2009 9:42:42 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. [with comments]

I have a lot of respect for Lauren for her [his djf] work on numerous issues on
Internet. So I am surprised and concerned about the tone Lauren has
taken on ICANN.

While there are certain room for improvement for ICANN in various
areas, the opening of new gTLD is an area that was a slated goal from
ICANN from its early days of formation of introducing competition to
back-then Network Solution and now Verisign.

Competition and choice for consumer is good. One may argue what the
balance should be, it is another take a position that ICANN is 'one
notch short of scam' in trying to introducing competition to the
marketplace.

-James Seng

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:12 AM, David Farber<dave () farber net> wrote:


Begin forwarded message:

From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com>
Date: June 27, 2009 11:09:15 AM EDT
To: nnsquad () nnsquad org
Subject: [ NNSquad ] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O.
[with comments]


This decision had been rumored for weeks.  Three comments:

1) The more TLDs that are introduced, the more confusion there is
  among both domain name holders and the Internet user community in
  general (that is, the population of the world).  As such, the main
  TLDs already in common use (com, net, org, edu + country TLDs)
  gain in value and demand since they will increasingly stand out
  amongst the clutter of MOBIes, SEXies, WIMPies, WACKies, and who
  knows what else, most of which will quite rightly be treated by
  consumers as confusing nonsense.  The driving force behind the
  introduction of new TLDs at this stage is creating new profit
  centers through consumer confusion, and ICANN has become the
  primary enabler of a domain name regime that we can charitably
  categorize as just one notch short of a scam.

2) ICANN is increasingly a white elephant whose original
  justifications have been warped in ways that Kafka might have
  appreciated, but that no longer tend to serve the interests of the
  Internet community at large.  It is difficult to see how it
  can have any long term future, especially given the international
  forces in play.

3) To Rod Beckstrom: You thought things were screwed up at NCC?
  You ain't seen nuthin' yet.  Lotsa luck ... you're gonna need it.

--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator

- - -

----- Forwarded message from David Farber <dave () farber net> -----

Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:30:32 -0400
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: [IP] Icann Hires Former Cybersecurity Chief as New C.E.O. -
       NYTimes.com
Reply-To: dave () farber net
To: ip <ip () v2 listbox com>


http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/06/26/technology/AP-US-TEC-Internet-Names.html?ref=technology




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

----- End forwarded message -----




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com





-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: