Interesting People mailing list archives

re Top Voting Machine Vendor Admits It Installed Remote-Access Software on Systems Sold to States


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:39:53 +0900




Begin forwarded message:

From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <jonathan.s.shapiro () gmail com>
Date: July 18, 2018 at 10:36:48 PM GMT+9
To: dave () farber net
Cc: ip <ip () listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] re Top Voting Machine Vendor Admits It Installed Remote-Access Software on Systems Sold to States

[for IP]

Dave:

I read with interest Joly MacFie’s note regarding the State of New York’s well-founded suspicion of electronic voting 
machines. I’d add several points to his comments:

1. Because the software that *runs* the voting machine is not created or maintained in a secure environment, the 
absence of networking does not render a voting machine secure. Further: there have been multiple demonstrations of 
successful on-site compromises of non-connected machines.

2. Of even greater concern, there is considerable evidence that the vote TABULATING machines have been compromised in 
close jurisdictions. This means that paper ballots can’t be trusted in those jurisdictions without a thorough audit.

3. The very close votes in key jurisdictions mean that statistical sampling is not sufficient to audit the vote in 
those jurisdictions. Each ballot must be individually confirmed.

4. The overwhelming vulnerability of our election process, coupled with the time limits on certification and the 
obstruction (both by political means and technical means) of vote validation means that we cannot have well-founded 
confidence in the results of recent elections. 

5. The Russian compromise of voter databases severely hampered Democratic efforts to get out the vote in 2016. I can 
say from personal experience that a staggering percentage of allegedly Democratic residents in door-to-door 
canvassing during the 2016 election turned out to be Republicans. While the database is never perfect, our experience 
suggests a 25%-30% error rate. That’s un-heard of.

Best regards,


Jonathan Shapiro



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-a538de84&post_id=20180718104007:738412F2-8A98-11E8-96D7-FDAFDB4C7C34
Powered by Listbox: https://www.listbox.com

Current thread: