Information Security News mailing list archives

Re: Re: SANS Top 20 Vulnerability List Updated


From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 02:52:43 -0600 (CST)

Forwarded from: Ejovi B. Nuwere <ejovi () ejovi net>

Actually, this top 20 list has helped me. It gives me the ability to
scan my entire network for attacks most likely to be automated or used
by script kiddies. Thats a huge help. And time saver.


On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 02:10:45AM -0600, InfoSec News wrote:
Forwarded from: Felix von Leitner <leitner () vim org>

Thus spake InfoSec News (isn () c4i org):

NIST has been working with SANS to provide an enhanced top 20
vulnerability list. The original list produced by SANS and the FBI
contained 20 important vulnerability areas with reference to over
140 specific vulnerabilities.

Short question: what the hell is going on here? What significance
could this have at all besides SANS telling us that they consider
themselves of earth-shattering importance?

Top 20 vulnerabilities?  Is this an E! franchise?

Why is worthless crap like a "top 20 vulnerabilities" list even done
at all?  Why not pay those obviously very talented and highly
respected members of the security community to actually do something
useful, like _do_ something against security vulnerabilities instead
of doing PR work?

Sheesh.  What's next?  The top 20 deseases causing bowel movement?

Felix




ejovi nuwere
http://www.ejovi.net



-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org

To unsubscribe email majordomo () attrition org with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY
of the mail.


Current thread: