Metasploit mailing list archives

SOS on unsetg

From: hdm at metasploit.com (H D Moore)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:59:13 -0600

This gets tricky when you try to enforce options. If there are required 
options for SMTPHOST and SRVHOST, you would need to enforce them based on 
what target/mode was set. Seems like it would make things more complicated 
and harder to configure properly.

On Tuesday 02 December 2008, egypt at metasploit.com wrote:

Maybe we could do something like the auxiliary modules and have
different actions for exploits, with a default action of 'webserver'
or whatever makes sense. ?This would allow the same interface for the
file format exploits as everything else.

Current thread:

SOS on unsetg jeffs (Nov 30)
- SOS on unsetg MC (Dec 01)
  - SOS on unsetg Patrick Webster (Dec 01)
    - SOS on unsetg egypt at metasploit.com (Dec 02)
    - SOS on unsetg H D Moore (Dec 02)
    - SOS on unsetg egypt at metasploit.com (Dec 02)
    - SOS on unsetg H D Moore (Dec 02)
    - MSFGUI - Audio Alerts? + bugs? Donnie Werner (Dec 02)