Re: db_autopwn problem and suggestions

[Rob Fuller <mubix () room362 com>]

Why wouldn't you just use the exploit module at that point?

--
Rob Fuller | Mubix
Room362.com | Hak5.org | TheAcademyPro.com


On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:31 AM, wullie millen <wullie21 () googlemail com>wrote:

> I have a small suggestion it would be good to be able to add a target to
> autopwn, I know this would be no  good for large scale scans but for one
> system  when using the -p option it would be good to fire off all suitable
> exploits for that system.
>
> -will
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:51 AM, HD Moore <hdm () metasploit com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 06:56 +0300, kalgecin () gmail com wrote:
> > > i have a suggestion,
> > > in my lab i have one windows vista and two linux boxes.
> > > when i scan them and do autopwn. but to my disappointment, it tries to
> > > exploit iis on the linux boxes. this really takes a long time and is
> > > useless. so my request is to add os support to the autopwn
> >
> > If you use a vulnerability scanner with the -x flag instead of nmap with
> > -p mode it cross-references the vulnerabilities. Stil, autopwn is pretty
> > useless.
> >
> > -HD
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework