Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: Metasploit 3.6.0
From: HD Moore <hdm () metasploit com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:24:51 -0600
On 3/10/2011 8:00 PM, George Georgalis wrote:
On Thu 10 Mar 2011 at 07:48:29 PM -0600, Jonathan Cran wrote:back to the future! :p. thanks for the report. -- fixed in r11930. also note you can always grab the release revision from the pro notes: https://www.metasploit.com/redmine/projects/pro/wikiThanks. Now that I have trunk, maybe I should just stick with it? Is trunk reasonably stable? Or would I be better off with a release while I'm learning msf?
Your best bet is to use the weekly snapshots that go through full QA before being pushed to the commercial update feed. You can find the individual SVN revisions numbers for each "blessed" update at: https://www.metasploit.com/redmine/projects/pro/wiki/Updates This is the exact revision that we ship in the weekly update to our commercial users. This may not be the "latest" code, but its the best tested at a given point in time, especially if you follow trunk today. Keep in mind that all commercial customers (Express or Pro) also get the benefit of Rapid7 support for most use cases of the open source framework. Myself and the other members of the development team handle tier-1 support calls and would be more than happy to help in this context. -HD _______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- Metasploit 3.6.0 George Georgalis (Mar 10)
- Re: Metasploit 3.6.0 Zate (Mar 10)
- Re: Metasploit 3.6.0 Jonathan Cran (Mar 10)
- Re: Metasploit 3.6.0 George Georgalis (Mar 10)
- Re: Metasploit 3.6.0 HD Moore (Mar 11)
- Re: Metasploit 3.6.0 Jonathan Cran (Mar 10)
- Re: Metasploit 3.6.0 Zate (Mar 10)